Do intergovernmental interactions increase government spending?

This study investigates yardstick competition in local government spending in South Korea. By leveraging the exogenous variation introduced by by-elections, the study estimates the influence of neighbouring jurisdictions on local expenditures. The findings reveal no significant interdependence in spending among South Korean municipalities, which contrasts with previous empirical studies from other countries. The results suggest that conventional spatial econometric methods may overestimate the degree of interdependence in local spending.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Studies
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2024.2393676
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do intergovernmental interactions increase government spending?

William H. Hoyt, Yunjun Kim, Ikhwan Kweon
1 citations
Policy Studies
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
2.23
article

Do intergovernmental interactions increase government spending?

William H. Hoyt, Yunjun Kim, Ikhwan Kweon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates yardstick competition in local government spending in South Korea. By leveraging the exogenous variation introduced by by-elections, the study estimates the influence of neighbouring jurisdictions on local expenditures. The findings reveal no significant interdependence in spending among South Korean municipalities, which contrasts with previous empirical studies from other countries. The results suggest that conventional spatial econometric methods may overestimate the degree of interdependence in local spending.

Policy StudiesVol. 47(1)
University of Tennessee at Martin (US), University of Kentucky (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.