They returned to the Chinese mainland, and what? A collaborative autoethnographic study on the career transitions of Chinese international doctorates from the West to the east
The purpose of this study is to analyse the approaches of three Chinese international doctoral degree holders who received their doctoral education in the West in tackling the challenges of relocation and career transition to the East after completing their doctoral degrees. Through a collaborative autoethnographic research from June 2020 to December 2022, from the theoretical perspectives of institutional theory, the study reveals four tactics of institutional arbitrage, driven by resources, purpose, practice, and legitimacy, allowed the Chinese international doctoral degree holders to extend their international academic networks to the local context, adapt research purposes to fit national needs, introduce effective practices from the international academic community to local institutions, and advocate for the legitimacy of cutting-edge research in the local academic community. Through these tactics, the multiple logics of profession, corporation, market, and state were found to be strengthened in the institutional environment, thus supporting their career development. The study further proposes to view Chinese international doctoral degree holders’ relocation to China as an important component of the international mobility of knowledge workers, contributing to the formation of global scholarship, rather than a simple return journey to their homeland.
Authors
- Nian Ruan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2413-9966)
- Gaoming Zheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3182-6166)
- Qijuan Shen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0906-3182)
Institutions
- Tongji University (CN)
- Tampere University (FI)
- Shenzhen University (CN)
- Shanghai Normal University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Asian Public Policy
- Published
- 2024-08-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2024.2386720
- Primary Topic
- Higher Education Governance and Development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science
- Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China