Energy dependence of x‐ray beam size produced by polycapillary x‐ray optics

Abstract In this work, we studied the x‐ray energy dependence of x‐ray beam diameter focused by polycapillary optics. A quantitative beam diameter–energy relation enables more accurate estimation of the element‐specific interrogation area of a sample using the compositional maps produced by a micro‐XRF system. This improves upon our ability to visualize individual beam‐diameter sized mineral grains and in turn directly benefits Planetary Instrument for X‐ray Lithochemistry (PIXL) analyses of martian soil in addition to benefitting other micro‐focused x‐ray fluorescence (XRF) systems. The spatial distribution of an array of characteristic XRF emission lines was measured by sampling via a knife‐edge approach with small motor stepping of the beam across target edges. Data taken as part of this effort, from the Planetary Flight Model (PFM), were limited to only seven beam energies corresponding to the elements Ni, Cu, Se, Ta, Au, Ti and Ba. Hence, we conducted additional analysis using JPL's lab‐based breadboard (LBB) micro‐XRF system, a system that emulates PIXL's functionality where we measured beam diameter corresponding to 18 elements: Na, Mg, Al, Si, Cl, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, Se, Sr and Mo. The experimental results were also compared with Monte Carlo simulations. The beam diameter ( y )–energy ( x ) relation that we obtained for LBB was y = 185.79 exp(−0.078 x ) whose exponential component was then used to get a more accurate relation for the PFM even with the limited data set: y = 227.53 exp(−0.078 x ). The difference in the two coefficients for the PFM and LBB stems mainly from the difference in the polycapillary optic design, and this work establishes x‐ray beam diameter versus energy relation quantitatively for both the systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
X-Ray Spectrometry
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.3450
Citations
10
Primary Topic
X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy dependence of x‐ray beam size produced by polycapillary x‐ray optics

Anusheela Das, W. T. Elam, B. C. Clark, S. J. VanBommel et al.
10 citations
X-Ray Spectrometry
X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
6.08
article

Energy dependence of x‐ray beam size produced by polycapillary x‐ray optics

Anusheela Das, W. T. Elam, B. C. Clark, S. J. VanBommel, Ning Gao, Abigail C. Allwood, Michael W. Jones, J. A. Hurowitz, Christopher M. Heirwegh, Lawrence A. Wade
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this work, we studied the x‐ray energy dependence of x‐ray beam diameter focused by polycapillary optics. A quantitative beam diameter–energy relation enables more accurate estimation of the element‐specific interrogation area of a sample using the compositional maps produced by a micro‐XRF system. This improves upon our ability to visualize individual beam‐diameter sized mineral grains and in turn directly benefits Planetary Instrument for X‐ray Lithochemistry (PIXL) analyses of martian soil in addition to benefitting other micro‐focused x‐ray fluorescence (XRF) systems. The spatial distribution of an array of characteristic XRF emission lines was measured by sampling via a knife‐edge approach with small motor stepping of the beam across target edges. Data taken as part of this effort, from the Planetary Flight Model (PFM), were limited to only seven beam energies corresponding to the elements Ni, Cu, Se, Ta, Au, Ti and Ba. Hence, we conducted additional analysis using JPL's lab‐based breadboard (LBB) micro‐XRF system, a system that emulates PIXL's functionality where we measured beam diameter corresponding to 18 elements: Na, Mg, Al, Si, Cl, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, Se, Sr and Mo. The experimental results were also compared with Monte Carlo simulations. The beam diameter ( y )–energy ( x ) relation that we obtained for LBB was y = 185.79 exp(−0.078 x ) whose exponential component was then used to get a more accurate relation for the PFM even with the limited data set: y = 227.53 exp(−0.078 x ). The difference in the two coefficients for the PFM and LBB stems mainly from the difference in the polycapillary optic design, and this work establishes x‐ray beam diameter versus energy relation quantitatively for both the systems.

X-Ray SpectrometryVol. 54(2)
Space Science Institute (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), Queensland University of Technology (AU), Washington University in St. Louis (US), X-ray Instrumentation Associates (United States) (US), University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory (US), Stony Brook University (US), Central Queensland University (AU)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
6.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.