Monetary policy, income distribution and semi‐autonomous demand in the US

Abstract We empirically explore the role of monetary and distribution shocks on semi‐autonomous demand under a supermultiplier framework. We use quarterly data for the United States from 1968 to 2022 and apply a SVAR model to investigate the effect of changes in financial and distributive variables on autonomous expenditure. We find that: (i) the federal funds rate has a negative and statistically significant effect on autonomous expenditure; (ii) a positive shock in the wage share (WS) has a negative effect on non‐revolving consumer credit (CC) and a transitory positive effect on induced consumption; (iii) a positive shock in aggregated autonomous demand has a positive, persistent, and significant effect on induced consumption and, output, as well as on the adjusted WS; (iv) a positive shock in private residential investment has a positive, persistent and statistically significant effect on other autonomous components of demand and output; (v) while residential investment positively influences CC and durable consumption, the inverse does not hold.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metroeconomica
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12479
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monetary policy, income distribution and semi‐autonomous demand in the US

Joana David Avritzer, Maria Cristina Barbieri Góes
1 citations
Metroeconomica
Economic Theory and Policy
0.83
article

Monetary policy, income distribution and semi‐autonomous demand in the US

Joana David Avritzer, Maria Cristina Barbieri Góes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We empirically explore the role of monetary and distribution shocks on semi‐autonomous demand under a supermultiplier framework. We use quarterly data for the United States from 1968 to 2022 and apply a SVAR model to investigate the effect of changes in financial and distributive variables on autonomous expenditure. We find that: (i) the federal funds rate has a negative and statistically significant effect on autonomous expenditure; (ii) a positive shock in the wage share (WS) has a negative effect on non‐revolving consumer credit (CC) and a transitory positive effect on induced consumption; (iii) a positive shock in aggregated autonomous demand has a positive, persistent, and significant effect on induced consumption and, output, as well as on the adjusted WS; (iv) a positive shock in private residential investment has a positive, persistent and statistically significant effect on other autonomous components of demand and output; (v) while residential investment positively influences CC and durable consumption, the inverse does not hold.

MetroeconomicaVol. 76(1)
University of Bergamo (IT), Connecticut College (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Economic Theory and Policy
0.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.