Independent and interdependent group contingencies to increase on‐task work behavior among adults with intellectual disabilities

Abstract We applied independent and interdependent group contingencies in a counterbalanced reversal experimental design to the vocational on‐task behavior for two groups of adults with intellectual disabilities. On‐task behavior increased for all participants in both groups above a criterion of 80% of time on‐task during both treatment phases. Independent and interdependent group contingencies were equally effective in increasing on‐task behavior. Responding was maintained at the criterion level for all members of one group at a 4‐week follow‐up. No increases in negative social interactions were observed when the interdependent group contingency was in effect and participants reported both contingencies to be socially valid. We suggest that group contingencies can be an effective intervention in increasing on‐task behavior of individuals with intellectual disabilities in vocational settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Interventions
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.2049
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Independent and interdependent group contingencies to increase on‐task work behavior among adults with intellectual disabilities

Svetlana Daly, Rebecca A. Sharp, Oliver C. Mudford, Katrina Phillips
1 citations
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
0.79
article

Independent and interdependent group contingencies to increase on‐task work behavior among adults with intellectual disabilities

Svetlana Daly, Rebecca A. Sharp, Oliver C. Mudford, Katrina Phillips
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We applied independent and interdependent group contingencies in a counterbalanced reversal experimental design to the vocational on‐task behavior for two groups of adults with intellectual disabilities. On‐task behavior increased for all participants in both groups above a criterion of 80% of time on‐task during both treatment phases. Independent and interdependent group contingencies were equally effective in increasing on‐task behavior. Responding was maintained at the criterion level for all members of one group at a 4‐week follow‐up. No increases in negative social interactions were observed when the interdependent group contingency was in effect and participants reported both contingencies to be socially valid. We suggest that group contingencies can be an effective intervention in increasing on‐task behavior of individuals with intellectual disabilities in vocational settings.

Behavioral InterventionsVol. 39(4)
University of Auckland (NZ)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
0.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.