The process model of self‐control: Developing a measure of self‐control strategies

Abstract The purpose of this research was to develop and examine a measure of self‐control strategies, proposed in the process model of self‐control. Across three studies ( N = 1045), we developed and refined items, examined scale dimensionality and relationships with orbiting constructs, and assessed criterion‐related validity. Findings provide initial support for a 34‐item measure of six self‐control strategies: five strategies that were theoretically proposed in the process model and one that emerged empirically from our data. The proposed Self‐Control Strategies Scale was significantly correlated with other similar measures and demonstrated expected relationships with orbiting constructs and criterion‐related validity. This measure may be useful in expanding our understanding of different strategies beneficial for long‐term goal pursuit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Psychology
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12566
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The process model of self‐control: Developing a measure of self‐control strategies

Michael W. McFerran, Mina Milosevic, Dominic Fedele, Sherif al‐Qallawi et al.
2 citations
Applied Psychology
Behavioral Health and Interventions
0.82
article

The process model of self‐control: Developing a measure of self‐control strategies

Michael W. McFerran, Mina Milosevic, Dominic Fedele, Sherif al‐Qallawi, Nicholas A. Moon, Patrick D. Converse
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this research was to develop and examine a measure of self‐control strategies, proposed in the process model of self‐control. Across three studies ( N = 1045), we developed and refined items, examined scale dimensionality and relationships with orbiting constructs, and assessed criterion‐related validity. Findings provide initial support for a 34‐item measure of six self‐control strategies: five strategies that were theoretically proposed in the process model and one that emerged empirically from our data. The proposed Self‐Control Strategies Scale was significantly correlated with other similar measures and demonstrated expected relationships with orbiting constructs and criterion‐related validity. This measure may be useful in expanding our understanding of different strategies beneficial for long‐term goal pursuit.

Applied PsychologyVol. 74(1)
Florida Institute of Technology (US), Boston Engineering (United States) (US), California State University, San Bernardino (US), Boston Consulting Group (United States)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The process model of self‐control: Developing a measure of self‐control strategies — Michael W. McFerran, Mina Milosevic, et al. · Applied Psychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS