Comparable Real-World Patient-Reported Outcomes Data Across Health Conditions, Settings, and Countries: The PROMIS International Collaboration

The patient voice is critical to achieving value-based care, improving health outcomes, and advancing medical research. However, a key challenge is how to translate this "voice" into scientifically valid data that can inform evidence-based clinical decisions. One of the biggest barriers is the sheer variety of available patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the associated challenges of translation, validation, implementation, and interpretation, making it difficult to obtain valid and comparable health outcomes. The authors present a harmonized global approach to international standardization of PROs and PROMs. This approach has the potential to accelerate patient-centered care by facilitating the collection of accurate and comparable real-world evidence on health outcomes that matter most to patients. This proposed approach consists of two elements: a data collection process based on a common set of PROs and a state-of-the-art measurement approach based on item response theory. First, there is growing evidence that outcomes such as pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, physical function, and the ability to participate in social roles and activities are relevant for most people, irrespective of their health condition. Measuring these outcomes routinely in all patients could increase outcome comparability and utility for a range of stakeholders. Second, a measurement strategy based on a state-of-the-art psychometric approach - using item response theory (IRT)-based item banks - offers short, flexible, sustainable, and universally applicable PROMs with robust measurement properties and a common measurement scale. The unique integration of these two elements offers the potential to collect comparable PROM data across patients and providers to support shared decision-making, which may lead to better outcomes. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a globally used example of such an approach. The PROMIS Profile measures serve as a resource for measuring a harmonized core set of PROs across medical conditions, languages, and countries. To meet the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all, at all ages, a collaborative effort is needed to achieve consensus on international standardization of PROs and PROMs to accelerate patient-centered care across health conditions, settings, and countries. The authors propose to routinely measure a core set of broadly relevant PROs in all patients, regardless of their health condition, with universally applicable IRT-based PROMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NEJM Catalyst
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1056/cat.24.0045
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparable Real-World Patient-Reported Outcomes Data Across Health Conditions, Settings, and Countries: The PROMIS International Collaboration

Jordi Alonso, Changrong Yuan, Danbee Kang, Rehab Alhasani et al.
19 citations
NEJM Catalyst
Cancer survivorship and care
5.37
article

Comparable Real-World Patient-Reported Outcomes Data Across Health Conditions, Settings, and Countries: The PROMIS International Collaboration

Jordi Alonso, Changrong Yuan, Danbee Kang, Rehab Alhasani, José M Valderas, Ay‐Woan Pan, Heeseung Choi, Fabio Efficace, John Eric Chaplin, Matthias Rose, Sein Schmidt, Melissa Tinsley, David F Cella, István Mucsi, Benjamin D. Schalet, Juhee Cho, Felix Fischer, Susan J. Bartlett, Rebecca Mercieca‐Bebber, Hildeberto Correia, Caroline B. Terwee, Wojciech Glinkowski, Gemma Vilagut, Sara Ahmed, Leo D. Roorda, Takeko Oishi
article en
19 citations

Abstract

The patient voice is critical to achieving value-based care, improving health outcomes, and advancing medical research. However, a key challenge is how to translate this "voice" into scientifically valid data that can inform evidence-based clinical decisions. One of the biggest barriers is the sheer variety of available patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the associated challenges of translation, validation, implementation, and interpretation, making it difficult to obtain valid and comparable health outcomes. The authors present a harmonized global approach to international standardization of PROs and PROMs. This approach has the potential to accelerate patient-centered care by facilitating the collection of accurate and comparable real-world evidence on health outcomes that matter most to patients. This proposed approach consists of two elements: a data collection process based on a common set of PROs and a state-of-the-art measurement approach based on item response theory. First, there is growing evidence that outcomes such as pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, physical function, and the ability to participate in social roles and activities are relevant for most people, irrespective of their health condition. Measuring these outcomes routinely in all patients could increase outcome comparability and utility for a range of stakeholders. Second, a measurement strategy based on a state-of-the-art psychometric approach - using item response theory (IRT)-based item banks - offers short, flexible, sustainable, and universally applicable PROMs with robust measurement properties and a common measurement scale. The unique integration of these two elements offers the potential to collect comparable PROM data across patients and providers to support shared decision-making, which may lead to better outcomes. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a globally used example of such an approach. The PROMIS Profile measures serve as a resource for measuring a harmonized core set of PROs across medical conditions, languages, and countries. To meet the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all, at all ages, a collaborative effort is needed to achieve consensus on international standardization of PROs and PROMs to accelerate patient-centered care across health conditions, settings, and countries. The authors propose to routinely measure a core set of broadly relevant PROs in all patients, regardless of their health condition, with universally applicable IRT-based PROMs.

NEJM CatalystVol. 5(9)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Northwestern University (US), The University of Sydney (AU), Seoul National University (KR), Johns Hopkins University (US), National University of Singapore (SG), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), National Taiwan University (TW), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), University of Toronto (CA), Tohoku University (JP), University of Exeter (GB), Fudan University (CN), Medical University of Warsaw (PL), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Reade (NL), Fondazione Gimema Onlus (IT), National Centre for Clinical Research on Emerging Drugs (AU), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (ES), National Health and Medical Research Council (AU), McGill University (CA), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Sungkyunkwan University (KR), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cancer survivorship and care
5.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.