Bismarck - Jekyll and Hyde? Reassessing Civil-Military Relations During the Franco-Prussian War

Previous research has highlighted that during the Franco-Prussian War Bismarck kept the ambitions of the military in check. He is seen as a statesman involved in peace-making, while Moltke and the general staff advocated ruthless warfare and struggled to exert influence on the political decision-making process. The article argues that the traditional concept of a separation between civil and military power is misleading when trying to understand civil–military relations in Prussia. Bismarck also tackled military matters and even held the rank of general. During the war, the military and political fields were areas where various parties struggled for power and competed to secure control over the decision-making process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
War in History
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09683445241264514
Primary Topic
European Political History Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bismarck - Jekyll and Hyde? Reassessing Civil-Military Relations During the Franco-Prussian War

Christoph Nübel
War in History
European Political History Analysis
article

Bismarck - Jekyll and Hyde? Reassessing Civil-Military Relations During the Franco-Prussian War

Christoph Nübel
article en

Abstract

Previous research has highlighted that during the Franco-Prussian War Bismarck kept the ambitions of the military in check. He is seen as a statesman involved in peace-making, while Moltke and the general staff advocated ruthless warfare and struggled to exert influence on the political decision-making process. The article argues that the traditional concept of a separation between civil and military power is misleading when trying to understand civil–military relations in Prussia. Bismarck also tackled military matters and even held the rank of general. During the war, the military and political fields were areas where various parties struggled for power and competed to secure control over the decision-making process.

War in HistoryVol. 32(1)
Leibniz-Centre for Contemporary History (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
European Political History Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.