Qualitative Comparative Policy Studies: An Introduction from the Special Section Editors

This inaugural article delineates the vision and scope of the new section "Qualitative Comparative Policy Studies" of the Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. The co-editors present the five key features of the section: the comparative, the transnational, the relational, the global, and the self-reflective. Concretely, they invite contributions on qualitative empirical research that (i) is comparative in its methods and interpretive framework, (ii) draws on the transnational dimension, (iii) considers the relational dimension of network governance, (iv) recognizes an unequal global setting, and (v) is self-reflective and interrogates international comparison as a governance tool. By definition, qualitative comparison is contextual comparison that differentiates between place and space and the temporalities of comparative policy analysis (period, timing, tempo, sequence, lifespan, and age).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2024.2383061
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Qualitative Comparative Policy Studies: An Introduction from the Special Section Editors

Gita Steiner‐Khamsi, Michelle Morais de Sá e Silva
6 citations
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice
Social Policy and Reform Studies
13.39
article

Qualitative Comparative Policy Studies: An Introduction from the Special Section Editors

Gita Steiner‐Khamsi, Michelle Morais de Sá e Silva
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This inaugural article delineates the vision and scope of the new section "Qualitative Comparative Policy Studies" of the Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. The co-editors present the five key features of the section: the comparative, the transnational, the relational, the global, and the self-reflective. Concretely, they invite contributions on qualitative empirical research that (i) is comparative in its methods and interpretive framework, (ii) draws on the transnational dimension, (iii) considers the relational dimension of network governance, (iv) recognizes an unequal global setting, and (v) is self-reflective and interrogates international comparison as a governance tool. By definition, qualitative comparison is contextual comparison that differentiates between place and space and the temporalities of comparative policy analysis (period, timing, tempo, sequence, lifespan, and age).

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and PracticeVol. 26(5)
Columbia University (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
13.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.