‘Fouled by Oil’? Oil Diplomacy and the Lausanne Conference, 1914–1928

The centenary of the 1923 Lausanne Treaty has seen historians challenge the familiar view of this re-settlement of the defeated Ottoman Empire as an enduring success, drawing attention to the ways in which the treaty validated a mandatory population exchange, now viewed as a form of ethnic cleansing. This reappraisal of Lausanne’s place in fashioning a new Middle East order has yet to address oil diplomacy. Competition among governments, oil companies and concession-hunters for rights to the oil of the former Ottoman Empire, in particular Mosul, inspired considerable speculation at the 1922–3 Lausanne Conference, and continues to fuel conspiracy theories surrounding Lausanne’s ‘secret clauses’. A tendency to tell the history of oil diplomacy in the first half of the twentieth century from the perspective of nation-states has made it difficult to explain the success with which emerging MNEs manipulated host governments, rather than being tools in the hands of statesmen pursuing energy security/energy independence. This essay argues that we need to assign oil companies greater agency if we want to understand the emergence of a global oil cartel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International History Review
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2024.2393642
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Fouled by Oil’? Oil Diplomacy and the Lausanne Conference, 1914–1928

Jonathan Conlin
4 citations
The International History Review
Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
24.17
article

‘Fouled by Oil’? Oil Diplomacy and the Lausanne Conference, 1914–1928

Jonathan Conlin
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The centenary of the 1923 Lausanne Treaty has seen historians challenge the familiar view of this re-settlement of the defeated Ottoman Empire as an enduring success, drawing attention to the ways in which the treaty validated a mandatory population exchange, now viewed as a form of ethnic cleansing. This reappraisal of Lausanne’s place in fashioning a new Middle East order has yet to address oil diplomacy. Competition among governments, oil companies and concession-hunters for rights to the oil of the former Ottoman Empire, in particular Mosul, inspired considerable speculation at the 1922–3 Lausanne Conference, and continues to fuel conspiracy theories surrounding Lausanne’s ‘secret clauses’. A tendency to tell the history of oil diplomacy in the first half of the twentieth century from the perspective of nation-states has made it difficult to explain the success with which emerging MNEs manipulated host governments, rather than being tools in the hands of statesmen pursuing energy security/energy independence. This essay argues that we need to assign oil companies greater agency if we want to understand the emergence of a global oil cartel.

The International History ReviewVol. 47(3)
Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
24.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.