Greenwashing, carbon emission, and ESG

Abstract Recent decades have seen an increasingly awareness of climate changes, putting a pressure on companies to do more to deal with carbon emission. One of the popular measures used in assessing how well a company commits to sustainable development and reduces carbon emissions is ESG ratings. Given the importance of both ESG ratings and carbon footprints on our society and the target of net zero by 2050, we explore the relation between carbon emission and the Refinitiv ESG scores for the US sample from 2005 to 2018. Our findings indicate that high ESG‐rated or environment‐rated firms do not have lower carbon emissions. It appears that these firms are not incentivized to do more for environment, as they have already been awarded with good publicity for being environmentally friendly. Finally, our findings also support the ‘cheap talk’ concept, greenwashing hypothesis and legitimacy theory. Companies are not genuinely committed to climate action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3929
Citations
81
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Greenwashing, carbon emission, and ESG

Steen Thomsen, Hue Hwa Au Yong, Khine Kyaw, Sirimon Treepongkaruna
81 citations
Business Strategy and the Environment
Environmental Sustainability in Business
35.11
article

Greenwashing, carbon emission, and ESG

Steen Thomsen, Hue Hwa Au Yong, Khine Kyaw, Sirimon Treepongkaruna
article en
81 citations

Abstract

Abstract Recent decades have seen an increasingly awareness of climate changes, putting a pressure on companies to do more to deal with carbon emission. One of the popular measures used in assessing how well a company commits to sustainable development and reduces carbon emissions is ESG ratings. Given the importance of both ESG ratings and carbon footprints on our society and the target of net zero by 2050, we explore the relation between carbon emission and the Refinitiv ESG scores for the US sample from 2005 to 2018. Our findings indicate that high ESG‐rated or environment‐rated firms do not have lower carbon emissions. It appears that these firms are not incentivized to do more for environment, as they have already been awarded with good publicity for being environmentally friendly. Finally, our findings also support the ‘cheap talk’ concept, greenwashing hypothesis and legitimacy theory. Companies are not genuinely committed to climate action.

Business Strategy and the EnvironmentVol. 33(8)
Chulalongkorn University (TH), The University of Western Australia (AU), Copenhagen Business School (DK), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Monash University (AU)
Novo Nordisk, Novo Nordisk Fonden
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
35.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Greenwashing, carbon emission, and ESG — Steen Thomsen, Hue Hwa Au Yong, et al. · Business Strategy and the Environment (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS