From a cultural to a distributive issue: Public climate action as a new field for comparative political economy

Abstract This article reviews recent insights from the blooming Comparative Political Economy (CPE) literature on climate change with the aim to demonstrate the importance of integrating climate change into the field of CPE and to highlight the contributions of CPE to our understanding of the social and political obstacles to effective climate policies. In addition, we advance two key points to bring the CPE literature forward. To tighten the dialogue between the “electoral politics” and “interest group politics” approaches, we propose understanding climate politics as a triadic conflict between losers of climate change, losers of public climate action (PCA), and winners of PCA. Second, we argue that the scope of CPE studies needs expansion. While existing CPE literature predominantly focuses on climate change mitigation, it is essential to consider climate change adaptation due to its significant distributive implications at the macro‐ and micro‐levels of societies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulation & Governance
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12620
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From a cultural to a distributive issue: Public climate action as a new field for comparative political economy

J. Fischer, Hanna Schwander
12 citations
Regulation & Governance
Climate Change Policy and Economics
13.55
article

From a cultural to a distributive issue: Public climate action as a new field for comparative political economy

J. Fischer, Hanna Schwander
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article reviews recent insights from the blooming Comparative Political Economy (CPE) literature on climate change with the aim to demonstrate the importance of integrating climate change into the field of CPE and to highlight the contributions of CPE to our understanding of the social and political obstacles to effective climate policies. In addition, we advance two key points to bring the CPE literature forward. To tighten the dialogue between the “electoral politics” and “interest group politics” approaches, we propose understanding climate politics as a triadic conflict between losers of climate change, losers of public climate action (PCA), and winners of PCA. Second, we argue that the scope of CPE studies needs expansion. While existing CPE literature predominantly focuses on climate change mitigation, it is essential to consider climate change adaptation due to its significant distributive implications at the macro‐ and micro‐levels of societies.

Regulation & GovernanceVol. 19(2)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), University of Oxford (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
13.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.