The impact of democracy on liquidity and information asymmetry for <scp>NYSE</scp> cross‐listed stocks

Abstract We investigate the empirical relationship between a country's democracy level, measured using the Democracy Index's five categories (electoral process and pluralism, the functioning of government, political participation, political culture, and civil liberties), and market liquidity for non‐US stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) from 2014 to 2019. Our analysis shows that non‐US stocks from countries with stronger democratic institutions have narrower spreads, a higher market quality index, smaller price impacts of trades, and lower probabilities of information‐based trading. We also find a significant correlation between changes in our liquidity measures and variations in a country's overall democracy level over time. Our results suggest that improving a country's level of democracy can enhance the market liquidity and quality of non‐US stocks, thus benefiting investors and promoting the overall stability and efficiency of financial markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Finance
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12469
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of democracy on liquidity and information asymmetry for NYSE cross‐listed stocks

Jang‐Chul Kim, Teressa Elliott, Qing Su
3 citations
International Review of Finance
Corporate Finance and Governance
2.84
article

The impact of democracy on liquidity and information asymmetry for NYSE cross‐listed stocks

Jang‐Chul Kim, Teressa Elliott, Qing Su
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract We investigate the empirical relationship between a country's democracy level, measured using the Democracy Index's five categories (electoral process and pluralism, the functioning of government, political participation, political culture, and civil liberties), and market liquidity for non‐US stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) from 2014 to 2019. Our analysis shows that non‐US stocks from countries with stronger democratic institutions have narrower spreads, a higher market quality index, smaller price impacts of trades, and lower probabilities of information‐based trading. We also find a significant correlation between changes in our liquidity measures and variations in a country's overall democracy level over time. Our results suggest that improving a country's level of democracy can enhance the market liquidity and quality of non‐US stocks, thus benefiting investors and promoting the overall stability and efficiency of financial markets.

International Review of FinanceVol. 25(1)
Northern Kentucky University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Corporate Finance and Governance
2.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of democracy on liquidity and information asymmetry for <scp>NYSE</scp> cross‐listed stocks — Jang‐Chul Kim, Teressa Elliott, et al. · International Review of Finance (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS