Whose streets? Understanding sexual minority support for the Black Lives Matter movement

Abstract Using a “political distinctiveness” lens, this study tested the claim that lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer people valued the goals and tactics of Black Lives Matter (BLM) more than heterosexual people did. Using a sample of currently enrolled college students ( N = 89), the study also tried to explain why a possible sexuality gap (that is, discrepancy in participation between heterosexuals and sexual minorities) for BLM support and involvement existed. Through a set of multivariate regressions, we concluded that sexual minority support of BLM was influenced by sexuality differences in group memberships, commitments to activism, and emotional bonds to people of color. Exposure to diversity courses in college and lesbian/gay communities, along with identifying as a queer person of color, increased BLM support, but they were not a significant force behind greater BLM activism for sexual minorities. We included suggestions for how social justice allies can support anti‐oppressive social movements in an impactful and just manner and how gender and race interact with sexual identity in support for activism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexuality Gender & Policy
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sgp2.12106
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whose streets? Understanding sexual minority support for the Black Lives Matter movement

Eric Swank, Breanne Fahs, Marli Mayon
Sexuality Gender & Policy
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Whose streets? Understanding sexual minority support for the Black Lives Matter movement

Eric Swank, Breanne Fahs, Marli Mayon
article en

Abstract

Abstract Using a “political distinctiveness” lens, this study tested the claim that lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer people valued the goals and tactics of Black Lives Matter (BLM) more than heterosexual people did. Using a sample of currently enrolled college students ( N = 89), the study also tried to explain why a possible sexuality gap (that is, discrepancy in participation between heterosexuals and sexual minorities) for BLM support and involvement existed. Through a set of multivariate regressions, we concluded that sexual minority support of BLM was influenced by sexuality differences in group memberships, commitments to activism, and emotional bonds to people of color. Exposure to diversity courses in college and lesbian/gay communities, along with identifying as a queer person of color, increased BLM support, but they were not a significant force behind greater BLM activism for sexual minorities. We included suggestions for how social justice allies can support anti‐oppressive social movements in an impactful and just manner and how gender and race interact with sexual identity in support for activism.

Sexuality Gender & PolicyVol. 7(3)
Arizona State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.