Financialization and an emerging “green investor state”: Examining China's use of state‐backed funds for green transition

Abstract China is simultaneously enacting a state‐led financialization of governance and a prioritization of environmental objectives. Resultingly, dedicated state‐backed green funds have grown in scale beyond US$70 billion. Drawing on interviews, policies, and financial databases, we examine these funds through policy document analysis, descriptive statistics, and three case studies. Tying together the literature on “financialization” and the “green state” we show how China's “market‐driven, government‐guided” type of state‐led financialization enhances the country's green state investment capacity. This is distinct from other countries' experience of diminishing capacities resulting from financialization of the state. We introduce the concept of a “green investor state” to capture China's approach and argue that the approach is difficult to replicate beyond state‐capitalist economies. However, the gradual return of industrial policy elsewhere makes the use of similar funds increasingly feasible globally, warranting further research on the use of green funds under none‐state‐led types of financialization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulation & Governance
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12625
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financialization and an emerging “green investor state”: Examining China's use of state‐backed funds for green transition

Kasper Ingeman Beck, Mathias Lund Larsen
14 citations
Regulation & Governance
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
7.55
article

Financialization and an emerging “green investor state”: Examining China's use of state‐backed funds for green transition

Kasper Ingeman Beck, Mathias Lund Larsen
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Abstract China is simultaneously enacting a state‐led financialization of governance and a prioritization of environmental objectives. Resultingly, dedicated state‐backed green funds have grown in scale beyond US$70 billion. Drawing on interviews, policies, and financial databases, we examine these funds through policy document analysis, descriptive statistics, and three case studies. Tying together the literature on “financialization” and the “green state” we show how China's “market‐driven, government‐guided” type of state‐led financialization enhances the country's green state investment capacity. This is distinct from other countries' experience of diminishing capacities resulting from financialization of the state. We introduce the concept of a “green investor state” to capture China's approach and argue that the approach is difficult to replicate beyond state‐capitalist economies. However, the gradual return of industrial policy elsewhere makes the use of similar funds increasingly feasible globally, warranting further research on the use of green funds under none‐state‐led types of financialization.

Regulation & GovernanceVol. 19(2)
Copenhagen Business School (DK), Brown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
7.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.