“Talking About Funerals Won’t Make You Dead”: Dialogic Tensions in Death Café Design and Facilitation

Death Cafes (DCs) explicitly encourage conversation and constitute space to explore the dialogue around death and dying. This study draws on scholarship from communication and dialogue theory to explore the design features and facilitation practices used within DC meetings. Through qualitative analysis of the DC webpage and interviews with facilitators, the study uncovers how DC facilitators structure and manage conversations to help attendees normalize death conversations and manage the death anxiety of others in their lives. The analysis highlights three main tensions within the DC structure and facilitation guidelines: structure versus openness, authority versus equality, and conversation versus information. These fundamental contradictions are inherent in DCs, and facilitators need to manage them in order to promote meaningful dialogue among DC participants. This study deepens the theorizing around DC facilitation practices and has implications for death and dying practitioners hoping to foster dialogue about end-of-life topics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228241272716
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Talking About Funerals Won’t Make You Dead”: Dialogic Tensions in Death Café Design and Facilitation

Laura W. Black, Jessica Cherry
2 citations
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
1.28
article

“Talking About Funerals Won’t Make You Dead”: Dialogic Tensions in Death Café Design and Facilitation

Laura W. Black, Jessica Cherry
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Death Cafes (DCs) explicitly encourage conversation and constitute space to explore the dialogue around death and dying. This study draws on scholarship from communication and dialogue theory to explore the design features and facilitation practices used within DC meetings. Through qualitative analysis of the DC webpage and interviews with facilitators, the study uncovers how DC facilitators structure and manage conversations to help attendees normalize death conversations and manage the death anxiety of others in their lives. The analysis highlights three main tensions within the DC structure and facilitation guidelines: structure versus openness, authority versus equality, and conversation versus information. These fundamental contradictions are inherent in DCs, and facilitators need to manage them in order to promote meaningful dialogue among DC participants. This study deepens the theorizing around DC facilitation practices and has implications for death and dying practitioners hoping to foster dialogue about end-of-life topics.

OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Ohio University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.