It got me thinking: The impact of participating in a divorce decision‐making interview

Although there is literature documenting the reasons for and outcomes of divorce, there is limited research about the divorce decision-making process. Researchers with the National Divorce Decision-Making Project interviewed (n = 30) people in the process of making a divorce decision. One year later they conducted a second interview (n = 22) with the same sample to track any changes in participants' divorce ideation. The current study reports on the results of a thematic analysis of participants' responses to the final question, "How did the initial interview impact your thinking about the future of your marriage?" Three salient themes emerged from the data: (1) talking got me thinking, (2) thinking got me acting, and (3) the conversation was (surprisingly) therapeutic. The authors highlight possible clinical implications and directions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12735
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

It got me thinking: The impact of participating in a divorce decision‐making interview

Kelly M. Roberts, Shauna R. Fenske, Steven M. Harris, Grace Anderson et al.
1 citations
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Family Dynamics and Relationships
1.71
article

It got me thinking: The impact of participating in a divorce decision‐making interview

Kelly M. Roberts, Shauna R. Fenske, Steven M. Harris, Grace Anderson, Sarah M. Allen, Jacqueline LaPlant‐Braughton
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although there is literature documenting the reasons for and outcomes of divorce, there is limited research about the divorce decision-making process. Researchers with the National Divorce Decision-Making Project interviewed (n = 30) people in the process of making a divorce decision. One year later they conducted a second interview (n = 22) with the same sample to track any changes in participants' divorce ideation. The current study reports on the results of a thematic analysis of participants' responses to the final question, "How did the initial interview impact your thinking about the future of your marriage?" Three salient themes emerged from the data: (1) talking got me thinking, (2) thinking got me acting, and (3) the conversation was (surprisingly) therapeutic. The authors highlight possible clinical implications and directions for future research.

Journal of Marital and Family TherapyVol. 50(4)
Southern Utah University (US), University of Minnesota (US), Ford Foundation (US), East Carolina University (US), Oklahoma Christian University (US), Hazelden Betty Ford Graduate School of Addiction Studies (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
1.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

It got me thinking: The impact of participating in a divorce decision‐making interview — Kelly M. Roberts, Shauna R. Fenske, et al. · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS