Trajectories of Treatment Burden Among Primary Care Patients with Long-Term Conditions in Southern China: A Latent Class Growth Analysis

Background: Treatment burden is a patient-centred, dynamic concept. However, longitudinal data on the changing pattern of treatment burden among patients with one or more long-term conditions (LTCs) are relatively scanty. We aimed to explore the longitudinal trajectories of treatment burden and associated risk factors in a large, patient population in primary care settings. Methods: We analysed data from 5573 primary care patients with long-term conditions (LTCs) recruited using a multistage sampling method in Shenzhen, southern China. The treatment burden was assessed by the Mandarin Chinese version of the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ). We used latent class growth mixture modelling (LCGMM) to determine trajectories of treatment burden across four time points, ie, at baseline, and at 6, 12, and 18 months. Predictors of trajectory classes were explored using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: The mean TBQ scores of patients with a single LTC (n = 2756), 2 LTCs (n = 1871), 3 LTCs (n = 699), and ≥ 4 LTCs (n = 247) were 18.17, 20.28, 21.32, and 26.10, respectively, at baseline. LCGMM identified three discrete classes of treatment burden trajectories over time, ie, a high-increasing class, a low-stable class, and a high-decreasing class. When controlling for individual-level factors including age, education, monthly household income per head, smoking, alcohol consumption, and attendance in health education, patients who had a clinical diagnosis of 3 LTCs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.21– 1.86, P < 0.001) or ≥ 4 LTCs (aOR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.44– 2.72, P < 0.001) were more likely to belong to the high-increasing class. Sensitivity analysis using propensity score methods obtained similar results. Conclusion: Our study revealed the presence of discrete patterns of treatment burden over time in Chinese primary care patients with LTCs, providing directions for tailored interventions to optimise disease management. Patients with 3 or more LTCs should receive close attention in healthcare delivery as they tend to experience a greater treatment burden. Keywords: longitudinal trajectories, treatment burden, long-term conditions, multimorbidity, risk factors

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s464434
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trajectories of Treatment Burden Among Primary Care Patients with Long-Term Conditions in Southern China: A Latent Class Growth Analysis

Zhihui Jia, José Hernández, Zimin Niu, Haoxiang Wang et al.
1 citations
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
0.39
article

Trajectories of Treatment Burden Among Primary Care Patients with Long-Term Conditions in Southern China: A Latent Class Growth Analysis

Zhihui Jia, José Hernández, Zimin Niu, Haoxiang Wang, Yuting Li, Jia Ji Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Treatment burden is a patient-centred, dynamic concept. However, longitudinal data on the changing pattern of treatment burden among patients with one or more long-term conditions (LTCs) are relatively scanty. We aimed to explore the longitudinal trajectories of treatment burden and associated risk factors in a large, patient population in primary care settings. Methods: We analysed data from 5573 primary care patients with long-term conditions (LTCs) recruited using a multistage sampling method in Shenzhen, southern China. The treatment burden was assessed by the Mandarin Chinese version of the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ). We used latent class growth mixture modelling (LCGMM) to determine trajectories of treatment burden across four time points, ie, at baseline, and at 6, 12, and 18 months. Predictors of trajectory classes were explored using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: The mean TBQ scores of patients with a single LTC (n = 2756), 2 LTCs (n = 1871), 3 LTCs (n = 699), and ≥ 4 LTCs (n = 247) were 18.17, 20.28, 21.32, and 26.10, respectively, at baseline. LCGMM identified three discrete classes of treatment burden trajectories over time, ie, a high-increasing class, a low-stable class, and a high-decreasing class. When controlling for individual-level factors including age, education, monthly household income per head, smoking, alcohol consumption, and attendance in health education, patients who had a clinical diagnosis of 3 LTCs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.21– 1.86, P < 0.001) or ≥ 4 LTCs (aOR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.44– 2.72, P < 0.001) were more likely to belong to the high-increasing class. Sensitivity analysis using propensity score methods obtained similar results. Conclusion: Our study revealed the presence of discrete patterns of treatment burden over time in Chinese primary care patients with LTCs, providing directions for tailored interventions to optimise disease management. Patients with 3 or more LTCs should receive close attention in healthcare delivery as they tend to experience a greater treatment burden. Keywords: longitudinal trajectories, treatment burden, long-term conditions, multimorbidity, risk factors

Risk Management and Healthcare PolicyVol. Volume 17
Hebei Medical University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Heritage Malta (MT), University of Oxford (GB), Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (CN), Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
Guangzhou Medical University, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Sun Yat-sen University
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.