Identification of Crude Distillation Unit: A Comparison between Neural Network and Koopman Operator

In this paper, we aimed to identify the dynamics of a crude distillation unit (CDU) using closed-loop data with NARX−NN and the Koopman operator in both linear (KL) and bilinear (KB) forms. A comparative analysis was conducted to assess the performance of each method under different experimental conditions, such as the gain, a delay and time constant mismatch, tight constraints, nonlinearities, and poor tuning. Although NARX−NN showed good training performance with the lowest Mean Squared Error (MSE), the KB demonstrated better generalization and robustness, outperforming the other methods. The KL observed a significant decline in performance in the presence of nonlinearities in inputs, yet it remained competitive with the KB under other circumstances. The use of the bilinear form proved to be crucial, as it offered a more accurate representation of CDU dynamics, resulting in enhanced performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algorithms
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/a17080368
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of Crude Distillation Unit: A Comparison between Neural Network and Koopman Operator

Rohit S. Patwardhan, Hussain S. Salloum, Mustapha K. Khaldi, Mujahed Al‐Dhaifallah et al.
2 citations
Algorithms
Fault Detection and Control Systems
0.66
article

Identification of Crude Distillation Unit: A Comparison between Neural Network and Koopman Operator

Rohit S. Patwardhan, Hussain S. Salloum, Mustapha K. Khaldi, Mujahed Al‐Dhaifallah, Abdulrazaq Nafiu Abubakar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we aimed to identify the dynamics of a crude distillation unit (CDU) using closed-loop data with NARX−NN and the Koopman operator in both linear (KL) and bilinear (KB) forms. A comparative analysis was conducted to assess the performance of each method under different experimental conditions, such as the gain, a delay and time constant mismatch, tight constraints, nonlinearities, and poor tuning. Although NARX−NN showed good training performance with the lowest Mean Squared Error (MSE), the KB demonstrated better generalization and robustness, outperforming the other methods. The KL observed a significant decline in performance in the presence of nonlinearities in inputs, yet it remained competitive with the KB under other circumstances. The use of the bilinear form proved to be crucial, as it offered a more accurate representation of CDU dynamics, resulting in enhanced performance.

AlgorithmsVol. 17(8)
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia) (SA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.