Comparative Policy Analysis of Photovoltaic Industry Development: Case Studies of China and the United States

Amidst the challenges in achieving the Paris Agreement objectives, the 28th Conference of the Parties (COP28) has injected renewed impetus, with the photovoltaic (PV) industry assuming a pivotal role. China and the United States, as major players in the global solar PV sector, have tailored policies reflecting the current status of their PV industries. Notably, China has transitioned from a government-led to a market-oriented approach, while the United States has pursued localization and trade protectionism strategies. This paper initiates with an overview of the PV industry policies of both countries, followed by a comparative analysis of their similarities and differences. Employing a comparative method seeks to unveil the geopolitical factors implicit in these policies, hindering cooperation between the two nations. Despite these challenges, the analysis also underscores the significant potential for collaboration in global environmental governance. In addition to highlighting the barriers to cooperation, the study aims to provide insights into opportunities for enhanced collaboration between China and the United States. By fostering cooperation, these nations can collectively address the pressing challenges posed by climate change and contribute to the realization of the Paris Agreement goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions on Economics Business and Management Research
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62051/mmts8z37
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Policy Analysis of Photovoltaic Industry Development: Case Studies of China and the United States

Xin Huang
Transactions on Economics Business and Management Research
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
article

Comparative Policy Analysis of Photovoltaic Industry Development: Case Studies of China and the United States

Xin Huang
article en

Abstract

Amidst the challenges in achieving the Paris Agreement objectives, the 28th Conference of the Parties (COP28) has injected renewed impetus, with the photovoltaic (PV) industry assuming a pivotal role. China and the United States, as major players in the global solar PV sector, have tailored policies reflecting the current status of their PV industries. Notably, China has transitioned from a government-led to a market-oriented approach, while the United States has pursued localization and trade protectionism strategies. This paper initiates with an overview of the PV industry policies of both countries, followed by a comparative analysis of their similarities and differences. Employing a comparative method seeks to unveil the geopolitical factors implicit in these policies, hindering cooperation between the two nations. Despite these challenges, the analysis also underscores the significant potential for collaboration in global environmental governance. In addition to highlighting the barriers to cooperation, the study aims to provide insights into opportunities for enhanced collaboration between China and the United States. By fostering cooperation, these nations can collectively address the pressing challenges posed by climate change and contribute to the realization of the Paris Agreement goals.

Transactions on Economics Business and Management ResearchVol. 9
University of International Relations (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.