Review on Methods for Assessing and Predicting Leaching of PFAS from Solid Matrices

Abstract Purpose of Review Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are prevalent environmental contaminants detected in materials such as soils, biosolids, and wastes. Understanding PFAS leaching is crucial for assessing risks associated with leaving impacted material in place, reuse, or disposal. However, there is limited guidance on laboratory methods to measure extent and rate of leaching. This review aims to identify the best methods for assessing PFAS leaching that are reflective of relevant release scenarios. Recent Findings Various methods have been applied to assess PFAS leaching from contaminated materials. The most common are batch leaching methods that simulate particular conditions (e.g. rainfall, landfill), with the intention of providing conservative estimates (worst-case scenarios) of cumulative PFAS release over time. Columns, static leaching, and rainfall simulators are also used to simulate less aggressive field-like conditions. While less common, pan and suction lysimeters have been used to measure PFAS leaching in situ. Most methods use saturated conditions that do not account for the possible influence of air–water interface accumulation and wetting–drying cycles on leaching. A notable gap is the scarcity of data benchmarking laboratory-leached concentrations with real-world PFAS concentrations. Establishing this relationship is crucial for reliable laboratory protocols. Summary This article reviews methods for estimating leaching of PFAS from contaminated materials. Given the variety of methods, selecting those that best simulate assessment objectives is essential. Specific scenarios requiring PFAS leaching assessment, such as leaving materials in place, reuse, and disposal, are discussed. The knowledge gaps presented could be used to improve existing leaching methods for better predictions and understanding of PFAS leachability. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Pollution Reports
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-024-00326-6
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review on Methods for Assessing and Predicting Leaching of PFAS from Solid Matrices

Naomi J. Boxall, Grant Douglas, Prashant Srivastava, Mike Williams et al.
17 citations
Current Pollution Reports
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
4.26
article

Review on Methods for Assessing and Predicting Leaching of PFAS from Solid Matrices

Naomi J. Boxall, Grant Douglas, Prashant Srivastava, Mike Williams, Emma R. Knight, Karl C. Bowles, Shervin Kabiri, Divina A. Navarro, Mike John McLaughlin, Rai S. Kookana, Jochen F. Mueller, Jennifer Braeunig
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are prevalent environmental contaminants detected in materials such as soils, biosolids, and wastes. Understanding PFAS leaching is crucial for assessing risks associated with leaving impacted material in place, reuse, or disposal. However, there is limited guidance on laboratory methods to measure extent and rate of leaching. This review aims to identify the best methods for assessing PFAS leaching that are reflective of relevant release scenarios. Recent Findings Various methods have been applied to assess PFAS leaching from contaminated materials. The most common are batch leaching methods that simulate particular conditions (e.g. rainfall, landfill), with the intention of providing conservative estimates (worst-case scenarios) of cumulative PFAS release over time. Columns, static leaching, and rainfall simulators are also used to simulate less aggressive field-like conditions. While less common, pan and suction lysimeters have been used to measure PFAS leaching in situ. Most methods use saturated conditions that do not account for the possible influence of air–water interface accumulation and wetting–drying cycles on leaching. A notable gap is the scarcity of data benchmarking laboratory-leached concentrations with real-world PFAS concentrations. Establishing this relationship is crucial for reliable laboratory protocols. Summary This article reviews methods for estimating leaching of PFAS from contaminated materials. Given the variety of methods, selecting those that best simulate assessment objectives is essential. Specific scenarios requiring PFAS leaching assessment, such as leaving materials in place, reuse, and disposal, are discussed. The knowledge gaps presented could be used to improve existing leaching methods for better predictions and understanding of PFAS leachability. Graphical Abstract

Current Pollution ReportsVol. 10(4)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), NSW Department of Planning and Environment (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NO), Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Australian Government, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
4.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.