Expressions for Stress Concentration Factors for T-Joints of Hollow and Concrete-Filled Square Cross-Sections for In-Plane Axial and Bending Loads

In recent years, square hollow section (SHS) joints with concrete-filled square hollow section (CFSHS) chords have increasingly been used in truss bridges where the fatigue life reliability is a critical issue. In this paper, a finite element analysis was performed to investigate the SCFs in SHS-CFSHS T-joints under in-plane bending in the brace, axial force in the chord and in-plane bending in the chord. The finite element models were developed and validated with experimental results. Then a parametric study was conducted with a reasonable range of three key non-dimensional parameters, i.e., β (width ratio between brace and chord), 2γ (width–to–wall thickness ratio of the chord) and τ (wall thickness ratio between brace and chord). Consequently, the stress concentration factor formulae for the fatigue design of SHS-CFSHS T-joints were proposed through multiple regression analysis. For in-plane bending in the brace, the maximum stress concentration factors were found at lines B and C for thick-walled chords (2γ = 25.0), while the stress concentration factors at all the lines need to be checked for thin-walled chords (2γ < 16.0). Under axial force in the chord and in-plane bending in the chord, only stress concentration factors at lines C and D needed to be considered. A comparison of stress concentration factors between SHS-SHS and SHS-CFSHS joints showed reductions of 10~26% and 14~31% in stress concentration factors in SHS-CFSHS joints under axial force in the brace and in-plane bending in the brace, respectively. In addition, it showed a general increase in stress concentration factors in SHS-CFSHS joints under axial force and in-plane bending in the chord. This reduction is attributed to the reduction in chord face deformation benefiting from the in-filled concrete. Meanwhile, the stress concentration factors caused by loads in the chord are much lower than those caused by loads in the brace. This work complements earlier studies on SHS-CFSHS T-joints under axial force.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16081082
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expressions for Stress Concentration Factors for T-Joints of Hollow and Concrete-Filled Square Cross-Sections for In-Plane Axial and Bending Loads

Hongxu Cui, Jun S. Liu, Hekuan Zhou, Xingzheng Wang et al.
3 citations
Symmetry
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
0.78
article

Expressions for Stress Concentration Factors for T-Joints of Hollow and Concrete-Filled Square Cross-Sections for In-Plane Axial and Bending Loads

Hongxu Cui, Jun S. Liu, Hekuan Zhou, Xingzheng Wang, Sheng Gao, Liyong Gao, Lei Jiang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In recent years, square hollow section (SHS) joints with concrete-filled square hollow section (CFSHS) chords have increasingly been used in truss bridges where the fatigue life reliability is a critical issue. In this paper, a finite element analysis was performed to investigate the SCFs in SHS-CFSHS T-joints under in-plane bending in the brace, axial force in the chord and in-plane bending in the chord. The finite element models were developed and validated with experimental results. Then a parametric study was conducted with a reasonable range of three key non-dimensional parameters, i.e., β (width ratio between brace and chord), 2γ (width–to–wall thickness ratio of the chord) and τ (wall thickness ratio between brace and chord). Consequently, the stress concentration factor formulae for the fatigue design of SHS-CFSHS T-joints were proposed through multiple regression analysis. For in-plane bending in the brace, the maximum stress concentration factors were found at lines B and C for thick-walled chords (2γ = 25.0), while the stress concentration factors at all the lines need to be checked for thin-walled chords (2γ < 16.0). Under axial force in the chord and in-plane bending in the chord, only stress concentration factors at lines C and D needed to be considered. A comparison of stress concentration factors between SHS-SHS and SHS-CFSHS joints showed reductions of 10~26% and 14~31% in stress concentration factors in SHS-CFSHS joints under axial force in the brace and in-plane bending in the brace, respectively. In addition, it showed a general increase in stress concentration factors in SHS-CFSHS joints under axial force and in-plane bending in the chord. This reduction is attributed to the reduction in chord face deformation benefiting from the in-filled concrete. Meanwhile, the stress concentration factors caused by loads in the chord are much lower than those caused by loads in the brace. This work complements earlier studies on SHS-CFSHS T-joints under axial force.

SymmetryVol. 16(8)
Chang'an University (CN), CCCC Highway Consultants (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.