Maps or Itineraries? A Systems Engineering Insight from Ancient Navigators

ABSTRACT Processes and procedures are the heart of current descriptions of systems engineering. The “vee diagram,” ISO 15288, the INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook, and enterprise‐specific business process models focus attention on process and procedure. However, there is a non‐procedural way to view systems engineering. This approach is to describe the configuration space “navigated” by systems engineering, and what is meant by system trajectories in that space, traveled during system life cycles. This sounds abstract because we have lacked explicit maps necessary to describe this configuration space. We understand concrete steps of a procedure, so we focus there. But where do these steps take us? And what does “where” mean in this context? Clues are found in recent discoveries about ancient navigation, as well as later development of mathematics and physics. This paper, part I of a case for stronger model‐based systems engineering (MBSE) semantics, focuses on the underlying configuration space inherent to systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Insight
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/inst.12497
Primary Topic
Software Engineering and Design Patterns
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maps or Itineraries? A Systems Engineering Insight from Ancient Navigators

William D. Schindel
Insight
Software Engineering and Design Patterns
article

Maps or Itineraries? A Systems Engineering Insight from Ancient Navigators

William D. Schindel
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Processes and procedures are the heart of current descriptions of systems engineering. The “vee diagram,” ISO 15288, the INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook, and enterprise‐specific business process models focus attention on process and procedure. However, there is a non‐procedural way to view systems engineering. This approach is to describe the configuration space “navigated” by systems engineering, and what is meant by system trajectories in that space, traveled during system life cycles. This sounds abstract because we have lacked explicit maps necessary to describe this configuration space. We understand concrete steps of a procedure, so we focus there. But where do these steps take us? And what does “where” mean in this context? Clues are found in recent discoveries about ancient navigation, as well as later development of mathematics and physics. This paper, part I of a case for stronger model‐based systems engineering (MBSE) semantics, focuses on the underlying configuration space inherent to systems.

InsightVol. 27(4)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Software Engineering and Design Patterns
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.