Integrated nutrient management on oat + grasspea intercropping system: an evaluation of system productivity, economics, energetics and carbon footprint

A field investigation took place at Central Research Farm of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, India during winter seasons of 2020-21 and 2021-22 with the aim to evaluate system productivity, economics, energetics and carbon footprint (CF) of oat + grasspea intercropping systems under different integrated nutrient managements (INM). The experiment was executed in split-plot design with 4 cropping systems in main plots and 4 levels of nutrient management in sub plots. The 3:3 intercropping system of oat + grasspea ensured highest system productivity, whereas sole grasspea stood best in terms of economics, energetics and environment safety by lowering CF. Notably, INM involving 75% N through urea + 25% N through vermicompost registered significantly higher system productivity in case of 3:3 oat + grasspea intercropping system (CS<sub>4</sub>N<sub>3</sub>) (18.77 q ha<sup>-1</sup>). Further, this intercropping system yielded high economic profitability (net return: US$ 430.4 ha<sup>-1</sup>, benefit-cost ratio: 1.71) as well as energy indices (energy output: 71179.1 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>, net energy gain: 60352.0 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>, energy ratio: 6.57 and energy profitability: 5.57). CF was also found relatively low under CS<sub>4</sub>N<sub>3</sub> (Yield scaled CF: 62.2 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-e q<sup>-1</sup>). Furthermore, high carbon efficiency (7.92) and carbon sustainability index (6.92) were also exhibited by CS<sub>4</sub>N<sub>3</sub> as it produced maximum carbon output (1801.2 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>). In conclusion, the 3:3 oat + grasspea intercropping system using INM can be viable option to ensure economic and energy viability and minimize greenhouse gas emissions without compromising system productivity. Particularly, this intercropping system combined with 75% N through urea + 25% N through vermicompost as INM option can be recommended for the cereal and legume growers of India, specifically under intensive cropping scenario.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66107-9
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated nutrient management on oat + grasspea intercropping system: an evaluation of system productivity, economics, energetics and carbon footprint

Saikat Biswas, Rupa Das, Kalyan Jana, Anandamoy Puste
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
2.27
article

Integrated nutrient management on oat + grasspea intercropping system: an evaluation of system productivity, economics, energetics and carbon footprint

Saikat Biswas, Rupa Das, Kalyan Jana, Anandamoy Puste
article en
4 citations

Abstract

A field investigation took place at Central Research Farm of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, India during winter seasons of 2020-21 and 2021-22 with the aim to evaluate system productivity, economics, energetics and carbon footprint (CF) of oat + grasspea intercropping systems under different integrated nutrient managements (INM). The experiment was executed in split-plot design with 4 cropping systems in main plots and 4 levels of nutrient management in sub plots. The 3:3 intercropping system of oat + grasspea ensured highest system productivity, whereas sole grasspea stood best in terms of economics, energetics and environment safety by lowering CF. Notably, INM involving 75% N through urea + 25% N through vermicompost registered significantly higher system productivity in case of 3:3 oat + grasspea intercropping system (CS<sub>4</sub>N<sub>3</sub>) (18.77 q ha<sup>-1</sup>). Further, this intercropping system yielded high economic profitability (net return: US$ 430.4 ha<sup>-1</sup>, benefit-cost ratio: 1.71) as well as energy indices (energy output: 71179.1 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>, net energy gain: 60352.0 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>, energy ratio: 6.57 and energy profitability: 5.57). CF was also found relatively low under CS<sub>4</sub>N<sub>3</sub> (Yield scaled CF: 62.2 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-e q<sup>-1</sup>). Furthermore, high carbon efficiency (7.92) and carbon sustainability index (6.92) were also exhibited by CS<sub>4</sub>N<sub>3</sub> as it produced maximum carbon output (1801.2 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>). In conclusion, the 3:3 oat + grasspea intercropping system using INM can be viable option to ensure economic and energy viability and minimize greenhouse gas emissions without compromising system productivity. Particularly, this intercropping system combined with 75% N through urea + 25% N through vermicompost as INM option can be recommended for the cereal and legume growers of India, specifically under intensive cropping scenario.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya (IN), Ramakrishna Mission Vidyamandira (IN), Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Educational and Research Institute (IN), Usha Martin (India) (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
2.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.