One-year outcome of robotical vs. manual percutaneous coronary intervention
R-PCI is feasible and safe. Compared to M-PCI, index procedure success rate is high, safety profile is favourable, and manual assistance was required in only few cases. At 1-year follow-up results for R-PCI vs. M-PCI considering mortality, rehospitalisation, morbidity and target vessel failure were equal.
Authors
- Timo Heidt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-7963)
- Dennis Wolf (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1525-4348)
- Ingo Hilgendorf (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0024-1643)
- Tau Hartikainen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0966-7250)
- Constantin von zur Mühlen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2767-8009)
- Alexander Supady (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4056-3652)
- Jonathan Rilinger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-3629)
- Thomas Maulhardt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3184-1366)
- Klaus Kaier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0837-6945)
- M Jeuck
- Dirk Westermann
Institutions
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
- University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
- Max Grundig Klinik (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinical Research in Cardiology
- Published
- 2024-08-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02524-0
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.44