A comparison between machine and deep learning models on high stationarity data

Advances in sensor, computing, and communication technologies are enabling big data analytics by providing time series data. However, conventional models struggle to identify sequence features and forecast accuracy. This paper investigates time series features and shows that some machine learning algorithms can outperform deep learning models. In particular, the problem analyzed concerned predicting the number of vehicles passing through an Italian tollbooth in 2021. The dataset, composed of 8766 rows and 6 columns relating to additional tollbooths, proved to have high stationarity and was treated through machine learning methods such as support vector machine, random forest, and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), as well as deep learning through recurrent neural networks with long short-term memory (RNN-LSTM) cells. From the comparison of these models, the prediction through the XGBoost algorithm outperforms competing algorithms, particularly in terms of MAE and MSE. The result highlights how a shallower algorithm than a neural network is, in this case, able to obtain a better adaptation to the time series instead of a much deeper model that tends to develop a smoother prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70341-6
Citations
25
Primary Topic
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison between machine and deep learning models on high stationarity data

Массимилиано Феррара, Domenico Santoro, Tiziana Ciano
25 citations
Scientific Reports
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
6.63
article

A comparison between machine and deep learning models on high stationarity data

Массимилиано Феррара, Domenico Santoro, Tiziana Ciano
article en
25 citations

Abstract

Advances in sensor, computing, and communication technologies are enabling big data analytics by providing time series data. However, conventional models struggle to identify sequence features and forecast accuracy. This paper investigates time series features and shows that some machine learning algorithms can outperform deep learning models. In particular, the problem analyzed concerned predicting the number of vehicles passing through an Italian tollbooth in 2021. The dataset, composed of 8766 rows and 6 columns relating to additional tollbooths, proved to have high stationarity and was treated through machine learning methods such as support vector machine, random forest, and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), as well as deep learning through recurrent neural networks with long short-term memory (RNN-LSTM) cells. From the comparison of these models, the prediction through the XGBoost algorithm outperforms competing algorithms, particularly in terms of MAE and MSE. The result highlights how a shallower algorithm than a neural network is, in this case, able to obtain a better adaptation to the time series instead of a much deeper model that tends to develop a smoother prediction.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
University of Foggia (IT), University of Aosta Valley (IT), University of Reggio Calabria (IT), Bocconi University (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
6.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparison between machine and deep learning models on high stationarity data — Массимилиано Феррара, Domenico Santoro, et al. · Scientific Reports (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS