Distinguishing signature of Kerr-MOG black hole and superspinar via Lense–Thirring precession

Abstract We examine the geometrical differences between the black hole (BH) and naked singularity (NS) or superspinar via Lense–Thirring (LT) precession in spinning modified-gravity (MOG). For BH case, we show that the LT precession frequency ( $$\Omega _{LT}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Ω</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>LT</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ) along the pole is proportional to the angular-momentum ( J ) parameter or spin parameter ( a ) and is inversely proportional to the cubic value of radial distance parameter, and also governed by Eq. (1). Along the equatorial plane it is governed by Eq. (2). While for superspinar , we show that the LT precession frequency is inversely proportional to the cubic value of the spin parameter and it decreases with distance by MOG parameter as derived in Eq. (3) at the pole and in the limit $$a&gt;&gt;r$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> (where a is spin parameter). For $$\theta \ne \frac{\pi }{2}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>θ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≠</mml:mo> <mml:mfrac> <mml:mi>π</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mfrac> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and in the superspinar limit, the spin frequency varies as $$\Omega _{LT}\propto \frac{1}{a^3\cos ^4\theta }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Ω</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>LT</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>∝</mml:mo> <mml:mfrac> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:msup> <mml:mo>cos</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mi>θ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfrac> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and by Eq. (38).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13210-w
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinguishing signature of Kerr-MOG black hole and superspinar via Lense–Thirring precession

Parthapratim Pradhan
2 citations
The European Physical Journal C
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
0.66
article

Distinguishing signature of Kerr-MOG black hole and superspinar via Lense–Thirring precession

Parthapratim Pradhan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We examine the geometrical differences between the black hole (BH) and naked singularity (NS) or superspinar via Lense–Thirring (LT) precession in spinning modified-gravity (MOG). For BH case, we show that the LT precession frequency ( $$\Omega _{LT}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Ω</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>LT</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ) along the pole is proportional to the angular-momentum ( J ) parameter or spin parameter ( a ) and is inversely proportional to the cubic value of radial distance parameter, and also governed by Eq. (1). Along the equatorial plane it is governed by Eq. (2). While for superspinar , we show that the LT precession frequency is inversely proportional to the cubic value of the spin parameter and it decreases with distance by MOG parameter as derived in Eq. (3) at the pole and in the limit $$a&gt;&gt;r$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> (where a is spin parameter). For $$\theta \ne \frac{\pi }{2}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>θ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≠</mml:mo> <mml:mfrac> <mml:mi>π</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mfrac> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and in the superspinar limit, the spin frequency varies as $$\Omega _{LT}\propto \frac{1}{a^3\cos ^4\theta }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Ω</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>LT</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>∝</mml:mo> <mml:mfrac> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:msup> <mml:mo>cos</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mi>θ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfrac> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and by Eq. (38).

The European Physical Journal CVol. 84(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Distinguishing signature of Kerr-MOG black hole and superspinar via Lense–Thirring precession — Parthapratim Pradhan · The European Physical Journal C (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS