Ovarian cancer risk prediction: a clinical epidemiology perspective

Ovarian cancer is a rare and highly heterogeneous disease usually detected at late stages when outcomes are poor. Population-based screening approaches have not been successful at reducing ovarian cancer mortality, but preventive bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is highly effective at preventing ovarian cancer in high-risk populations. Ovarian cancer risk prediction models may allow identification of populations at increased risk of ovarian cancer for preventive interventions or targeted early detection. We propose a life-course approach to ovarian cancer risk prediction based on the time at which a risk model should be applied and the risk factors that are available. The discriminative ability of ovarian cancer risk prediction models published so far is limited, with areas under the curve ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 for different combinations of risk factors and genetic susceptibility markers. Currently proposed absolute risk thresholds for preventive surgery are around 4% lifetime risk. The absolute risk predicted by ovarian cancer risk models ranges from 0.6% to 2.5% lifetime risk in the general population, highlighting the need to improve ovarian cancer risk prediction models and evaluating new preventive approaches that can be offered to individuals at lower risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae293
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ovarian cancer risk prediction: a clinical epidemiology perspective

Brett M. Reid, Britt Erickson, Shelley S. Tworoger, Parichoy Pal Choudhury et al.
6 citations
American Journal of Epidemiology
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
3.22
article

Ovarian cancer risk prediction: a clinical epidemiology perspective

Brett M. Reid, Britt Erickson, Shelley S. Tworoger, Parichoy Pal Choudhury, Nicolas Wentzensen, Kari Lassen Ring, Thomas J. O'Donnell, David P. Check
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is a rare and highly heterogeneous disease usually detected at late stages when outcomes are poor. Population-based screening approaches have not been successful at reducing ovarian cancer mortality, but preventive bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is highly effective at preventing ovarian cancer in high-risk populations. Ovarian cancer risk prediction models may allow identification of populations at increased risk of ovarian cancer for preventive interventions or targeted early detection. We propose a life-course approach to ovarian cancer risk prediction based on the time at which a risk model should be applied and the risk factors that are available. The discriminative ability of ovarian cancer risk prediction models published so far is limited, with areas under the curve ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 for different combinations of risk factors and genetic susceptibility markers. Currently proposed absolute risk thresholds for preventive surgery are around 4% lifetime risk. The absolute risk predicted by ovarian cancer risk models ranges from 0.6% to 2.5% lifetime risk in the general population, highlighting the need to improve ovarian cancer risk prediction models and evaluating new preventive approaches that can be offered to individuals at lower risk.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 194(5)
American Cancer Society (US), National Institutes of Health (US), University of Minnesota (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), National Cancer Institute (US), Minnesota Department of Health (US), Department of Health and Human Services (US), University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.