Training and Assessment of Clinician’s Utilization of the Los Angeles Classification for Reflux Esophagitis

Background: Endoscopic recognition of reflux esophagitis is critical for the evaluation and treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease; however, there are limited data on the need for education to minimize interobserver disagreement in clinical practice. Methods: We created an educational program for the LA classification on the International Working Group for the Classification of Oesophagitis (IWGCO) website that included endoscopic video recordings of the distal esophagus. Participants completed an entry survey before the training module and were able to proceed to subsequent training videos once they provided the correct LA classification. Participants then completed a test module—an 80% score was required to pass. Descriptive analyses and regression analyses were performed to analyze data. Results: In the entry survey, 83/90 (92%) participants reported using the LA classification for the majority or all patients with reflux symptoms. However, only 31/90 (34%) participants reported feeling very or completely confident in the use of the LA classification. Only 3/71 (4.2%) participants correctly classified all 9 training videos on their first attempt. The testing module was completed by 60 participants, 16 (26.7%) of whom passed after one attempt, with 32 (53.3%), 8 (13.3%), and 1 (1.7%) passing after 2, 3, and 4 attempts, respectively. There was no significant correlation between the number of attempts to successfully pass the testing module and participant characteristics. Conclusion: Even after a training module, >75% of participants required more than one attempt to correctly classify the test videos. Further structured education around the LA classification is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foregut The Journal of the American Foregut Society
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161241269002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training and Assessment of Clinician’s Utilization of the Los Angeles Classification for Reflux Esophagitis

David Armstrong, Dennis Wang, Yuhong Yuan, Kayla Dadgar et al.
1 citations
Foregut The Journal of the American Foregut Society
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
0.46
article

Training and Assessment of Clinician’s Utilization of the Los Angeles Classification for Reflux Esophagitis

David Armstrong, Dennis Wang, Yuhong Yuan, Kayla Dadgar, Prateek Sharma, Paul Sinclair
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic recognition of reflux esophagitis is critical for the evaluation and treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease; however, there are limited data on the need for education to minimize interobserver disagreement in clinical practice. Methods: We created an educational program for the LA classification on the International Working Group for the Classification of Oesophagitis (IWGCO) website that included endoscopic video recordings of the distal esophagus. Participants completed an entry survey before the training module and were able to proceed to subsequent training videos once they provided the correct LA classification. Participants then completed a test module—an 80% score was required to pass. Descriptive analyses and regression analyses were performed to analyze data. Results: In the entry survey, 83/90 (92%) participants reported using the LA classification for the majority or all patients with reflux symptoms. However, only 31/90 (34%) participants reported feeling very or completely confident in the use of the LA classification. Only 3/71 (4.2%) participants correctly classified all 9 training videos on their first attempt. The testing module was completed by 60 participants, 16 (26.7%) of whom passed after one attempt, with 32 (53.3%), 8 (13.3%), and 1 (1.7%) passing after 2, 3, and 4 attempts, respectively. There was no significant correlation between the number of attempts to successfully pass the testing module and participant characteristics. Conclusion: Even after a training module, >75% of participants required more than one attempt to correctly classify the test videos. Further structured education around the LA classification is needed.

Foregut The Journal of the American Foregut SocietyVol. 5(1)
London Health Sciences Centre (CA), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), McMaster University (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.