Enhancing the health and wellbeing benefits of biodiversity citizen science

Engagement in biodiversity citizen science initiatives can confer health and wellbeing benefits to individuals and communities. Yet, few biodiversity citizen science initiatives are explicitly planned to optimize health and wellbeing as a potential co-benefit, leading to missed opportunities for biodiversity conservation and human health. In this perspective, we use a dose-response approach to discuss the components that determine how engagement in biodiversity citizen science initiatives map onto opportunities to foster health and wellbeing benefits. We considered aspects related to the duration and frequency of contact with nature, and the intensity of interactions with nature and between individuals to highlight the different health benefits across the variety of citizen science initiatives. To illustrate these aspects, we use a sample of 95 citizen science initiatives from seven English and non-English-speaking countries and show how careful project design can increase the potential to confer health and wellbeing benefits to participants. We conclude with considerations on how to enhance the health and wellbeing benefits from citizen science initiatives, and propose potential research avenues to assess synergies and trade-offs between benefits to biodiversity and human health from these initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1444161
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Animal and Plant Science Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing the health and wellbeing benefits of biodiversity citizen science

Aletta Bonn, Rachel Rui Ying Oh, Nancy A. Pachana, Richard A. Fuller et al.
4 citations
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Animal and Plant Science Education
2.57
article

Enhancing the health and wellbeing benefits of biodiversity citizen science

Aletta Bonn, Rachel Rui Ying Oh, Nancy A. Pachana, Richard A. Fuller, Birte Peters, Nicola J. Sockhill, Corey T. Callaghan, Andrés Felipe Suárez‐Castro, Angela J. Dean
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Engagement in biodiversity citizen science initiatives can confer health and wellbeing benefits to individuals and communities. Yet, few biodiversity citizen science initiatives are explicitly planned to optimize health and wellbeing as a potential co-benefit, leading to missed opportunities for biodiversity conservation and human health. In this perspective, we use a dose-response approach to discuss the components that determine how engagement in biodiversity citizen science initiatives map onto opportunities to foster health and wellbeing benefits. We considered aspects related to the duration and frequency of contact with nature, and the intensity of interactions with nature and between individuals to highlight the different health benefits across the variety of citizen science initiatives. To illustrate these aspects, we use a sample of 95 citizen science initiatives from seven English and non-English-speaking countries and show how careful project design can increase the potential to confer health and wellbeing benefits to participants. We conclude with considerations on how to enhance the health and wellbeing benefits from citizen science initiatives, and propose potential research avenues to assess synergies and trade-offs between benefits to biodiversity and human health from these initiatives.

Frontiers in Environmental ScienceVol. 12
Griffith University (AU), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), The University of Queensland (AU), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), University of Florida (US), University of Fort Lauderdale (US), Agriculture and Food (AU), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Animal and Plant Science Education
2.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.