Why it works: Using qualitative methods in economic education research

The authors of this article present arguments for why and how qualitative research should be used in economic education. These arguments recognize the nature of economics as a discipline and economics educators’ current expertise and preferences. The authors have five goals: (i) clarifying how and why the use of qualitative research in economic education fits in with economics as a discipline; (ii) identifying practical limitations of quantitative research in economic education; (iii) reviewing the limited literature on qualitative research in economic education; (iv) proposing how qualitative and quantitative methods can be combined in a mixed methods approach that recognizes the methodological assumptions of economics and the expertise of economists, and finally, (v) suggesting characteristics of systematic and rigorous qualitative research in economic education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Economic Education
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2024.2389941
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovations in Educational Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why it works: Using qualitative methods in economic education research

Amanda Brooke Jennings, Peter Davies, William Bosshardt
2 citations
The Journal of Economic Education
Innovations in Educational Methods
4.19
article

Why it works: Using qualitative methods in economic education research

Amanda Brooke Jennings, Peter Davies, William Bosshardt
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The authors of this article present arguments for why and how qualitative research should be used in economic education. These arguments recognize the nature of economics as a discipline and economics educators’ current expertise and preferences. The authors have five goals: (i) clarifying how and why the use of qualitative research in economic education fits in with economics as a discipline; (ii) identifying practical limitations of quantitative research in economic education; (iii) reviewing the limited literature on qualitative research in economic education; (iv) proposing how qualitative and quantitative methods can be combined in a mixed methods approach that recognizes the methodological assumptions of economics and the expertise of economists, and finally, (v) suggesting characteristics of systematic and rigorous qualitative research in economic education.

The Journal of Economic EducationVol. 55(4)
Stockholm University (SE), University of Michigan (US), Florida Atlantic University (US), University of Birmingham (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Innovations in Educational Methods
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why it works: Using qualitative methods in economic education research — Amanda Brooke Jennings, Peter Davies, et al. · The Journal of Economic Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS