DERMAL FAT GRAFT VERSUS BONE GRAFT FOR MAXILLARY AUGMENTATION IN CLEFT RHINOPLASTY

Maxillary hypoplasia is common in patients with cleft lip and palate deformities, often leading to aesthetic and functional concerns. Objectives: The study's main objective is to find the dermal fat graft versus bone graft for maxillary augmentation in cleft rhinoplasty. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Burns and Plastic Surgery Center Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar from December 2021 to December 2022. Data were collected from 58 patients who underwent cleft rhinoplasty. Data were collected from 58 patients according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. All the data related to demographics, history, surgery, and post, and preoperative outcomes were noted for this study. Results: Data were collected from 58 patients from both genders. At the preoperative stage, patients undergoing dermal fat grafting reported a mean VAS score of 2.5 ± 0.3, while those receiving bone grafts had a slightly higher score of 3.0 ± 0.4. However, by 3 months postoperative, both groups experienced substantial increases in satisfaction, with mean VAS scores of 6.2 ± 0.6 for dermal fat grafts and 6.8 ± 0.7 for bone grafts. These improvements continued at 6 and 12 months, with mean VAS scores reaching 7.5 ± 0.8 and 8.0 ± 0.7 for dermal fat grafts, and 8.3 ± 0.9 and 8.7 ± 0.8 for bone grafts, respectively. Conclusion: It is concluded that both dermal fat graft and bone graft are viable options for maxillary augmentation in cleft rhinoplasty. While dermal fat graft may offer superior aesthetic outcomes and reduced donor site morbidity, bone graft provides greater structural support and long-term stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1042
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DERMAL FAT GRAFT VERSUS BONE GRAFT FOR MAXILLARY AUGMENTATION IN CLEFT RHINOPLASTY

Muhammad Khawar Abbas, Saima Ayub, Ambreen Mehmood Awan, Imran Khan et al.
1 citations
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
0.55
article

DERMAL FAT GRAFT VERSUS BONE GRAFT FOR MAXILLARY AUGMENTATION IN CLEFT RHINOPLASTY

Muhammad Khawar Abbas, Saima Ayub, Ambreen Mehmood Awan, Imran Khan, AUS AYUB
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Maxillary hypoplasia is common in patients with cleft lip and palate deformities, often leading to aesthetic and functional concerns. Objectives: The study's main objective is to find the dermal fat graft versus bone graft for maxillary augmentation in cleft rhinoplasty. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Burns and Plastic Surgery Center Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar from December 2021 to December 2022. Data were collected from 58 patients who underwent cleft rhinoplasty. Data were collected from 58 patients according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. All the data related to demographics, history, surgery, and post, and preoperative outcomes were noted for this study. Results: Data were collected from 58 patients from both genders. At the preoperative stage, patients undergoing dermal fat grafting reported a mean VAS score of 2.5 ± 0.3, while those receiving bone grafts had a slightly higher score of 3.0 ± 0.4. However, by 3 months postoperative, both groups experienced substantial increases in satisfaction, with mean VAS scores of 6.2 ± 0.6 for dermal fat grafts and 6.8 ± 0.7 for bone grafts. These improvements continued at 6 and 12 months, with mean VAS scores reaching 7.5 ± 0.8 and 8.0 ± 0.7 for dermal fat grafts, and 8.3 ± 0.9 and 8.7 ± 0.8 for bone grafts, respectively. Conclusion: It is concluded that both dermal fat graft and bone graft are viable options for maxillary augmentation in cleft rhinoplasty. While dermal fat graft may offer superior aesthetic outcomes and reduced donor site morbidity, bone graft provides greater structural support and long-term stability.

Biological and Clinical Sciences Research JournalVol. 2024(1)
Karachi Medical and Dental College (PK), University of Lahore (PK), Hayatabad Medical Complex (PK), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.