Task-irrelevant visual distractions and mindful self-regulated learning in a low-stakes computer-based assessment

Introduction There is a growing concern about the threat of distractions in online learning environments. It has been suggested that mindfulness may attenuate the effects of distraction. The extent to which this translates to academic performance is under investigation. We aimed to investigate the relationship between task-irrelevant visual distraction, time pressure, and mindful self-regulated learning in the context of a low-stake computer-based assessment. Methods The study sampled 712 registered users of Prolific.co who were prescreened, current undergraduate university students. After data quality screening, 609 were retained for analyses. A 2 × 2 between-subjects design was used. Participants were randomly assigned to the following groups: (1) a control condition, (2) a distract condition, (3) a time pressure condition, or (4) a distract and time pressure condition. All participants completed reading comprehension questions, demographic questions, and the Mindful Self-Regulated Learning Scale. Results Presenting a visual distraction increased self-reported distraction and having a clock present increased self-reported time pressure. The distraction did not have a statistically significant effect on test performance. Mindfulness was negatively correlated with test performance, self-reported distraction, and self-reported time pressure. Discussion Continuous task-irrelevant visual distractions may not be distracting enough to influence low-stakes testing performance, but they do influence self-perceptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1360848
Primary Topic
Mind wandering and attention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Task-irrelevant visual distractions and mindful self-regulated learning in a low-stakes computer-based assessment

Sarah M. Wolff, Daniel B. Wright, Wilson J. Hatcher
Frontiers in Education
Mind wandering and attention
article

Task-irrelevant visual distractions and mindful self-regulated learning in a low-stakes computer-based assessment

Sarah M. Wolff, Daniel B. Wright, Wilson J. Hatcher
article en

Abstract

Introduction There is a growing concern about the threat of distractions in online learning environments. It has been suggested that mindfulness may attenuate the effects of distraction. The extent to which this translates to academic performance is under investigation. We aimed to investigate the relationship between task-irrelevant visual distraction, time pressure, and mindful self-regulated learning in the context of a low-stake computer-based assessment. Methods The study sampled 712 registered users of Prolific.co who were prescreened, current undergraduate university students. After data quality screening, 609 were retained for analyses. A 2 × 2 between-subjects design was used. Participants were randomly assigned to the following groups: (1) a control condition, (2) a distract condition, (3) a time pressure condition, or (4) a distract and time pressure condition. All participants completed reading comprehension questions, demographic questions, and the Mindful Self-Regulated Learning Scale. Results Presenting a visual distraction increased self-reported distraction and having a clock present increased self-reported time pressure. The distraction did not have a statistically significant effect on test performance. Mindfulness was negatively correlated with test performance, self-reported distraction, and self-reported time pressure. Discussion Continuous task-irrelevant visual distractions may not be distracting enough to influence low-stakes testing performance, but they do influence self-perceptions.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 9
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Mind wandering and attention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.