Credit rating agencies’ views on China’s Belt and Road Initiative

How do credit rating agencies (CRAs) view China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)? Our analysis of 132 countries in 2000-17 demonstrates that Chinese foreign investment adversely affects sovereign ratings of recipient countries when these countries participate officially in the BRI but is otherwise insignificant. These results indicate that rather than being a generic China bias, the BRI bias is a geopolitical bias, based on CRA's expectation that BRI recipients become more dependent economically and politically on China. The main implication of our findings in financial terms is that CRAs limit the supply of international capital to BRI recipients. In broader terms of international political economy, this indicates a feedback loop whereby BRI funding repels Western funding and increases dependence on more BRI financing. Put differently, CRAs exacerbate the structural shift in the world political economy toward a decoupling between the US and Chinese financial spheres of influence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eurasian Geography and Economics
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2024.2393626
Citations
2
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Credit rating agencies’ views on China’s Belt and Road Initiative

Liam Keenan, Stefanos Ioannou, Dariusz Wójcik
2 citations
Eurasian Geography and Economics
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
4.46
article

Credit rating agencies’ views on China’s Belt and Road Initiative

Liam Keenan, Stefanos Ioannou, Dariusz Wójcik
article en
2 citations

Abstract

How do credit rating agencies (CRAs) view China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)? Our analysis of 132 countries in 2000-17 demonstrates that Chinese foreign investment adversely affects sovereign ratings of recipient countries when these countries participate officially in the BRI but is otherwise insignificant. These results indicate that rather than being a generic China bias, the BRI bias is a geopolitical bias, based on CRA's expectation that BRI recipients become more dependent economically and politically on China. The main implication of our findings in financial terms is that CRAs limit the supply of international capital to BRI recipients. In broader terms of international political economy, this indicates a feedback loop whereby BRI funding repels Western funding and increases dependence on more BRI financing. Put differently, CRAs exacerbate the structural shift in the world political economy toward a decoupling between the US and Chinese financial spheres of influence.

Eurasian Geography and Economics
Oxford Brookes University (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), National University of Singapore (SG)
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.