Evaluating the response of the Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer to monoterpene- and isoprene-derived organic nitrate standards

An accurate quantification of organic nitrate (RONO2) is important owing to its contribution to organic aerosol (OA) and its impacts on NOx cycling and ozone formation. Here, we calibrate and evaluate the response of the Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) to synthetic monoterpene- and isoprene-derived RONO2 standards. The dominant fraction of nitrogen is detected as NO2+ and NO+ ions in the AMS with the NOx ratio (NO2+/NO+) being substantially lower than that of ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3). The NOx ratio also varies among the RONO2 standards, possibly driven by the proximity of other functional groups to the nitrate group and/or the position to which the nitrate group is attached (aliphatic vs. cyclic). The best match of the nitrogen-containing moiety mass concentrations of particulate RONO2 (pRONO2) between the AMS and a condensation particle counter (CPC) is observed when the CPC-derived concentrations are calculated using a molecular weight of 46 g mol−1 (NO2) rather than commonly assumed 62 g mol−1 (NO3). This result is consistent with the thermal decomposition on the AMS vaporizer predominantly breaking the O–N bond rather than the R–O bond of R–O–NO2 species. The estimation of pRONO2 mass concentration by the AMS depends on the identity of the measured nitrogen-containing moiety of pRONO2, which for the AMS has been historically assumed as NO3 (62 g mol−1) instead of NO2 (46 g mol−1) as found in this study. Therefore, actual pRONO2 mass concentrations as well as their contribution to OA could be higher than previously reported in literature by 35%, further highlighting the prevalence of pRONO2 in ambient environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerosol Science and Technology
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2024.2389183
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the response of the Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer to monoterpene- and isoprene-derived organic nitrate standards

Yunle Chen, Benjamin A. Nault, Masayuki Takeuchi, N. L. Ng et al.
7 citations
Aerosol Science and Technology
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
2.63
article

Evaluating the response of the Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer to monoterpene- and isoprene-derived organic nitrate standards

Yunle Chen, Benjamin A. Nault, Masayuki Takeuchi, N. L. Ng, Yuchen Wang, Manjula R. Canagaratna
article en
7 citations

Abstract

An accurate quantification of organic nitrate (RONO2) is important owing to its contribution to organic aerosol (OA) and its impacts on NOx cycling and ozone formation. Here, we calibrate and evaluate the response of the Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) to synthetic monoterpene- and isoprene-derived RONO2 standards. The dominant fraction of nitrogen is detected as NO2+ and NO+ ions in the AMS with the NOx ratio (NO2+/NO+) being substantially lower than that of ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3). The NOx ratio also varies among the RONO2 standards, possibly driven by the proximity of other functional groups to the nitrate group and/or the position to which the nitrate group is attached (aliphatic vs. cyclic). The best match of the nitrogen-containing moiety mass concentrations of particulate RONO2 (pRONO2) between the AMS and a condensation particle counter (CPC) is observed when the CPC-derived concentrations are calculated using a molecular weight of 46 g mol−1 (NO2) rather than commonly assumed 62 g mol−1 (NO3). This result is consistent with the thermal decomposition on the AMS vaporizer predominantly breaking the O–N bond rather than the R–O bond of R–O–NO2 species. The estimation of pRONO2 mass concentration by the AMS depends on the identity of the measured nitrogen-containing moiety of pRONO2, which for the AMS has been historically assumed as NO3 (62 g mol−1) instead of NO2 (46 g mol−1) as found in this study. Therefore, actual pRONO2 mass concentrations as well as their contribution to OA could be higher than previously reported in literature by 35%, further highlighting the prevalence of pRONO2 in ambient environments.

Aerosol Science and TechnologyVol. 58(12)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Hunan University (CN), Aerodyne Research (US)
National Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.