Beliefs, strategic interaction, and Hong Kong’s anti-extradition law movement: A game-theoretic analysis

Given the information and beliefs about the possibility of repression, when will the civil society organize protests against the government? Under what conditions will the government repress popular protests? In this paper, I employ a novel signaling game to model the strategic interaction between the regime and civil society during the 2019 Anti-Extradition Law Movement in Hong Kong. I illustrate how information and beliefs influence whether the civil society mobilizes mass protests. Specifically, I examine how government actions shape the civil society’s beliefs about the government type, which in turn determine the protest turnouts and the government’s decision to repress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rationality and Society
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10434631241274899
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beliefs, strategic interaction, and Hong Kong’s anti-extradition law movement: A game-theoretic analysis

Theodore Charm
1 citations
Rationality and Society
Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
1.13
article

Beliefs, strategic interaction, and Hong Kong’s anti-extradition law movement: A game-theoretic analysis

Theodore Charm
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Given the information and beliefs about the possibility of repression, when will the civil society organize protests against the government? Under what conditions will the government repress popular protests? In this paper, I employ a novel signaling game to model the strategic interaction between the regime and civil society during the 2019 Anti-Extradition Law Movement in Hong Kong. I illustrate how information and beliefs influence whether the civil society mobilizes mass protests. Specifically, I examine how government actions shape the civil society’s beliefs about the government type, which in turn determine the protest turnouts and the government’s decision to repress.

Rationality and SocietyVol. 37(1)
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.