Interpreting and Managing Laboratory Data below the Quantification and Detection Threshold

ABSTRACT One of the problems of interpreting laboratory reports with data below reporting and detection limits is that there is no standard for reporting. Therefore, laboratories are using different nomenclature, definitions, and reporting formats for low-level data. Some knowledge of laboratory processes is often needed to find all the information required to accurately interpret laboratory reports. To make correct conclusions based on the statistical analysis of such data, a collaboration between a data analyst and a chemist to review the narrative explaining the data package and accurately interpret detection and reporting limits and data qualifiers is needed. This paper is written to aid data analysts and laboratory operational and quality managers in recognizing issues with reporting low-level data and to avoid common pitfalls in their interpretation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1520/jte20240068
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreting and Managing Laboratory Data below the Quantification and Detection Threshold

Polona K. Carson
2 links
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Interpreting and Managing Laboratory Data below the Quantification and Detection Threshold

Polona K. Carson
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT One of the problems of interpreting laboratory reports with data below reporting and detection limits is that there is no standard for reporting. Therefore, laboratories are using different nomenclature, definitions, and reporting formats for low-level data. Some knowledge of laboratory processes is often needed to find all the information required to accurately interpret laboratory reports. To make correct conclusions based on the statistical analysis of such data, a collaboration between a data analyst and a chemist to review the narrative explaining the data package and accurately interpret detection and reporting limits and data qualifiers is needed. This paper is written to aid data analysts and laboratory operational and quality managers in recognizing issues with reporting low-level data and to avoid common pitfalls in their interpretation.

Journal of Testing and EvaluationVol. 52(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.