Investment timing and quantity under ambiguity and business cycles

We extend a dynamic investment model that captures the conjoint effect of ambiguity and the business cycle on the investment threshold and endogenous investment quantity choice. This paper focuses on investment strategies under the combined effects of ambiguity and business cycles. We reveal through quantitative results that the risk effect and ambiguity effect have opposite effects on optimal investment threshold and optimal investment quantity, and the risk effect dominates the ambiguity effect. The transfer intensity coefficient from a boom period to a recession period and the risk effect are opposite effects, and the transfer intensity coefficient effect dominates the risk effect. Moreover, the transfer intensity coefficient from a boom period to a recession period has a synergistic effect with the ambiguity effect. Meanwhile, the transfer intensity coefficient from recession to boom is the opposite effect of risk and a synergistic effect with ambiguity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Economics
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2024.2394713
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investment timing and quantity under ambiguity and business cycles

Shou Chen, Wenhe Song
1 citations
Journal of Applied Economics
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
0.54
article

Investment timing and quantity under ambiguity and business cycles

Shou Chen, Wenhe Song
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We extend a dynamic investment model that captures the conjoint effect of ambiguity and the business cycle on the investment threshold and endogenous investment quantity choice. This paper focuses on investment strategies under the combined effects of ambiguity and business cycles. We reveal through quantitative results that the risk effect and ambiguity effect have opposite effects on optimal investment threshold and optimal investment quantity, and the risk effect dominates the ambiguity effect. The transfer intensity coefficient from a boom period to a recession period and the risk effect are opposite effects, and the transfer intensity coefficient effect dominates the risk effect. Moreover, the transfer intensity coefficient from a boom period to a recession period has a synergistic effect with the ambiguity effect. Meanwhile, the transfer intensity coefficient from recession to boom is the opposite effect of risk and a synergistic effect with ambiguity.

Journal of Applied EconomicsVol. 27(1)
Hunan University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investment timing and quantity under ambiguity and business cycles — Shou Chen, Wenhe Song · Journal of Applied Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS