Ecosystem extent is a necessary but not sufficient indicator of the state of global forest biodiversity

Abstract The Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework lays out an ambitious set of goals and targets aimed at halting and reversing biodiversity loss. The extent of natural ecosystems has been selected as one of a small set of headline indicators against which countries will report progress under this framework. We evaluate the effectiveness with which this indicator is expected to capture the overall scope of the ecosystem‐focused component of Goal A, and interlinkages with the species‐focused component of this same goal, using extensive global data on the integrity, connectivity, and plant species composition of forests. Results generated for all forest‐supporting countries demonstrate that consideration of these additional factors can profoundly alter understanding of the state of forest biodiversity relative to that based on extent alone. Employment of ecosystem extent as a headline indicator must therefore be augmented by appropriate use of component and complementary indicators addressing other key dimensions of ecosystem change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Letters
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.13045
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecosystem extent is a necessary but not sufficient indicator of the state of global forest biodiversity

James E. M. Watson, Jenet Austin, Simon Ferrier, Chris Ware et al.
7 citations
Conservation Letters
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
1.98
article

Ecosystem extent is a necessary but not sufficient indicator of the state of global forest biodiversity

James E. M. Watson, Jenet Austin, Simon Ferrier, Chris Ware, Hedley S. Grantham, Thomas D. Harwood
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework lays out an ambitious set of goals and targets aimed at halting and reversing biodiversity loss. The extent of natural ecosystems has been selected as one of a small set of headline indicators against which countries will report progress under this framework. We evaluate the effectiveness with which this indicator is expected to capture the overall scope of the ecosystem‐focused component of Goal A, and interlinkages with the species‐focused component of this same goal, using extensive global data on the integrity, connectivity, and plant species composition of forests. Results generated for all forest‐supporting countries demonstrate that consideration of these additional factors can profoundly alter understanding of the state of forest biodiversity relative to that based on extent alone. Employment of ecosystem extent as a headline indicator must therefore be augmented by appropriate use of component and complementary indicators addressing other key dimensions of ecosystem change.

Conservation LettersVol. 17(5)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Bush Heritage Australia (AU), Wildlife Conservation Society (US), The University of Queensland (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Oxford (GB), CSIRO Scientific Computing (AU), ACT Government (AU)
Wildlife Conservation Society
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.