Non-itinerant-type ferromagnetism and the magnetocaloric response of quinary all-d-metal ribbon: Ni<sub>35</sub>Mn<sub>34.5</sub>Co<sub>14</sub>Fe<sub>1</sub>Ti<sub>15.5</sub>

Abstract Most of the ferromagnetic shape memory (FSM) Heusler alloys, which are primarily studied in bulk form in the literature, exhibit p-d type hybridization. This study conducts a thorough multidirectional investigation of a strongly d-d hybridized quinary melt-spun annealed ribbon having the composition Ni 35 Mn 34.5 Co 14 Fe 1 Ti 15.5 (NMCFT-1). This off-stoichiometric, polycrystalline FSM, fabricated using the melt-spin technique, exhibits a highly textured microstructure, double magnetic transitions and super-mechanical features mitigating brittleness. It crystallizes in a perfectly B2-type disorder austenite (Pm-3m, space group number 221) phase at room temperature. It has been hypothesized that geometric frustration is the causative factor for this disorder. Curie temperature of austenite phase ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) between paramagnetic → ferromagnetic state is found to be ∼364.57 K, whereas martensite transformation temperature from weak magnetic martensite state to ferromagnetic austenite state is ∼174.74 K. Calculated moments (effective moment, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> = 5.12 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>B</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ; low-temperature saturation moment, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> (or <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) = 5.08 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>B</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) yield a Rhodes–Wohlfarth ratio of ∼1, indicating the existence of the non-itinerant nature of 3d electrons, whereas the ferromagnetism and the linear or non-linear dependency of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) on T 2 around <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> indicates the presence of long-range Rudermann–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida-type interaction. More importantly, the maximum magnetic entropy change ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) obtained across the first-order magneto-structural transition and second-order magnetic transition are +18.2 J·kg −1 K −1 at 6 T and −8.8 J·kg −1 K −1 at 2 T, respectively, while a very high working temperature span (Δ T FWHM ) of 28.561 K and 6.922 K are found for the same condition. The sample exhibits a significant relative cooling power of 402.98 J·kg −1 at a magnetic field of 6 T across the FOMT and 60.19 J·kg −1 at a 2 T field across the SOMT, respectively, along with excellent mechanical features such as a Vickers hardness (HV) of 411.80 HV (∼4.04 GPa). Meanwhile, Chen’s super hard model fails to predict the ribbon’s HV value, but Miao’s hard model does, indicating that the ribbon is hard but not super hard. It also paves the way for additional investigation into innovative FSMs like this.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics D Applied Physics
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ad7154
Primary Topic
Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-itinerant-type ferromagnetism and the magnetocaloric response of quinary all-d-metal ribbon: Ni35Mn34.5Co14Fe1Ti15.5

T. K. Nath, Sourav Mandal
Journal of Physics D Applied Physics
Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
article

Non-itinerant-type ferromagnetism and the magnetocaloric response of quinary all-d-metal ribbon: Ni35Mn34.5Co14Fe1Ti15.5

T. K. Nath, Sourav Mandal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Most of the ferromagnetic shape memory (FSM) Heusler alloys, which are primarily studied in bulk form in the literature, exhibit p-d type hybridization. This study conducts a thorough multidirectional investigation of a strongly d-d hybridized quinary melt-spun annealed ribbon having the composition Ni 35 Mn 34.5 Co 14 Fe 1 Ti 15.5 (NMCFT-1). This off-stoichiometric, polycrystalline FSM, fabricated using the melt-spin technique, exhibits a highly textured microstructure, double magnetic transitions and super-mechanical features mitigating brittleness. It crystallizes in a perfectly B2-type disorder austenite (Pm-3m, space group number 221) phase at room temperature. It has been hypothesized that geometric frustration is the causative factor for this disorder. Curie temperature of austenite phase ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) between paramagnetic → ferromagnetic state is found to be ∼364.57 K, whereas martensite transformation temperature from weak magnetic martensite state to ferromagnetic austenite state is ∼174.74 K. Calculated moments (effective moment, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> = 5.12 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>B</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ; low-temperature saturation moment, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> (or <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) = 5.08 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>B</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) yield a Rhodes–Wohlfarth ratio of ∼1, indicating the existence of the non-itinerant nature of 3d electrons, whereas the ferromagnetism and the linear or non-linear dependency of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) on T 2 around <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> indicates the presence of long-range Rudermann–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida-type interaction. More importantly, the maximum magnetic entropy change ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) obtained across the first-order magneto-structural transition and second-order magnetic transition are +18.2 J·kg −1 K −1 at 6 T and −8.8 J·kg −1 K −1 at 2 T, respectively, while a very high working temperature span (Δ T FWHM ) of 28.561 K and 6.922 K are found for the same condition. The sample exhibits a significant relative cooling power of 402.98 J·kg −1 at a magnetic field of 6 T across the FOMT and 60.19 J·kg −1 at a 2 T field across the SOMT, respectively, along with excellent mechanical features such as a Vickers hardness (HV) of 411.80 HV (∼4.04 GPa). Meanwhile, Chen’s super hard model fails to predict the ribbon’s HV value, but Miao’s hard model does, indicating that the ribbon is hard but not super hard. It also paves the way for additional investigation into innovative FSMs like this.

Journal of Physics D Applied PhysicsVol. 57(49)
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.