Accuracy of Speech Sound Analysis: Comparison of an Automatic Artificial Intelligence Algorithm With Clinician Assessment

Purpose: Automatic speech analysis (ASA) and automatic speech recognition systems are increasingly being used in the treatment of speech sound disorders (SSDs). When utilized as a home practice tool or in the absence of the clinician, the ASA system has the potential to facilitate treatment gains. However, the feedback accuracy of such systems varies, a factor that may impact these gains. The current research analyzes the feedback accuracy of a novel ASA algorithm (Amplio Learning Technologies), in comparison to clinician judgments. Method: A total of 3,584 consonant stimuli, produced by 395 American English–speaking children and adolescents with SSDs (age range: 4–18 years), were analyzed with respect to automatic classification of the ASA algorithm, clinician–ASA agreement, and interclinician agreement. Further analysis of results as related to phoneme acquisition categories (early-, middle-, and late-acquired phonemes) was conducted. Results: Agreement between clinicians and ASA classification for sounds produced accurately was above 80% for all phonemes, with some variation based on phoneme acquisition category (early, middle, late). This variation was also noted for ASA classification into “acceptable,” “unacceptable,” and “unknown” (which means no determination of phoneme accuracy) categories, as well as interclinician agreement. Clinician–ASA agreement was reduced for misarticulated sounds. Conclusions: The initial findings of Amplio's novel algorithm are promising for its potential use within the context of home practice, as it demonstrates high feedback accuracy for correctly produced sounds. Furthermore, complexity of sound influences consistency of perception, both by clinicians and by automated platforms, indicating variable performance of the ASA algorithm across phonemes. Taken together, the ASA algorithm may be effective in facilitating speech sound practice for children with SSDs, even in the absence of the clinician.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_jslhr-24-00009
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of Speech Sound Analysis: Comparison of an Automatic Artificial Intelligence Algorithm With Clinician Assessment

Yair Shapira, Eduard Rudyk, Michal Icht, Micalle Carl et al.
3 citations
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Language Development and Disorders
2.37
article

Accuracy of Speech Sound Analysis: Comparison of an Automatic Artificial Intelligence Algorithm With Clinician Assessment

Yair Shapira, Eduard Rudyk, Michal Icht, Micalle Carl, Heather Leavy Rusiewicz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Automatic speech analysis (ASA) and automatic speech recognition systems are increasingly being used in the treatment of speech sound disorders (SSDs). When utilized as a home practice tool or in the absence of the clinician, the ASA system has the potential to facilitate treatment gains. However, the feedback accuracy of such systems varies, a factor that may impact these gains. The current research analyzes the feedback accuracy of a novel ASA algorithm (Amplio Learning Technologies), in comparison to clinician judgments. Method: A total of 3,584 consonant stimuli, produced by 395 American English–speaking children and adolescents with SSDs (age range: 4–18 years), were analyzed with respect to automatic classification of the ASA algorithm, clinician–ASA agreement, and interclinician agreement. Further analysis of results as related to phoneme acquisition categories (early-, middle-, and late-acquired phonemes) was conducted. Results: Agreement between clinicians and ASA classification for sounds produced accurately was above 80% for all phonemes, with some variation based on phoneme acquisition category (early, middle, late). This variation was also noted for ASA classification into “acceptable,” “unacceptable,” and “unknown” (which means no determination of phoneme accuracy) categories, as well as interclinician agreement. Clinician–ASA agreement was reduced for misarticulated sounds. Conclusions: The initial findings of Amplio's novel algorithm are promising for its potential use within the context of home practice, as it demonstrates high feedback accuracy for correctly produced sounds. Furthermore, complexity of sound influences consistency of perception, both by clinicians and by automated platforms, indicating variable performance of the ASA algorithm across phonemes. Taken together, the ASA algorithm may be effective in facilitating speech sound practice for children with SSDs, even in the absence of the clinician.

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing ResearchVol. 67(9)
Google (United States) (US), Duquesne University (US), Ariel University (IL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Language Development and Disorders
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.