Sovereign risk and Dutch disease
I study how, in the presence of default risk, the Dutch disease amplifies an inefficiency in the sectoral allocation of capital. In a sovereign default model with commodities and production of traded and non-traded goods, default incentives increase when more capital is allocated to non-traded production. Households do not internalize this, giving rise to an inefficiently large non-traded sector. Commodity windfalls amplify this inefficiency through the classic Dutch disease mechanism. I characterize state-contingent subsidies that implement the efficient allocation and compare them to a simpler subsidy rule that ameliorates the externality. Evidence from spreads, natural-resource rents, and sectoral investment data support the main findings of the model. • Private investment in non-traded sectors is inefficiently large under default risk. • Commodity windfalls amplify this inefficiency through the Dutch disease mechanism. • Subsidy rules that are linear in spreads attain substantial welfare gains.
Authors
- Carlos Esquivel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7314-1061)
Institutions
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Monetary Economics
- Published
- 2024-08-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2024.103663
- Primary Topic
- Global Financial Crisis and Policies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00