A combined modeling method for complex multi-fidelity data fusion
Abstract Currently, mainstream methods for multi-fidelity data fusion have achieved great success in many fields, but they generally suffer from poor scalability. Therefore, this paper proposes a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> combination modeling method for complex multi-fidelity data fusion, devoted to solving the modeling problems with three types of multi-fidelity data fusion, and explores a general solution for any n types of multi-fidelity data fusion. Different from the traditional direct modeling method—Multi-Fidelity Deep Neural Network (MFDNN)—the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> method is an indirect modeling method. The experimental results on three representative benchmark functions and the prediction tasks of SG6043 airfoil aerodynamic performance show that <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> combination modeling has the following advantages: (1) It can quickly establish the mapping relationship between high, medium, and low fidelity data. (2) It can effectively solve the data imbalance problem in multi-fidelity modeling. (3) Compared with MFDNN, it has stronger noise resistance and higher prediction accuracy. Additionally, this paper discusses the scalability problem of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> method when n = 4 and n = 5, providing a reference for further research on the combined modeling method.
Authors
- Wanqiu Jiang
- Lei Tang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2917-2961)
- Anping Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2030-8355)
- Qingfeng Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8299-2992)
- Feng Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4173-5659)
- Yubo Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6376-6324)
- Jun Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4081-7897)
Institutions
- Southwest University of Science and Technology (CN)
- China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Engineering (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Machine Learning Science and Technology
- Published
- 2024-08-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad718f
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.17