A combined modeling method for complex multi-fidelity data fusion

Abstract Currently, mainstream methods for multi-fidelity data fusion have achieved great success in many fields, but they generally suffer from poor scalability. Therefore, this paper proposes a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> combination modeling method for complex multi-fidelity data fusion, devoted to solving the modeling problems with three types of multi-fidelity data fusion, and explores a general solution for any n types of multi-fidelity data fusion. Different from the traditional direct modeling method—Multi-Fidelity Deep Neural Network (MFDNN)—the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> method is an indirect modeling method. The experimental results on three representative benchmark functions and the prediction tasks of SG6043 airfoil aerodynamic performance show that <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> combination modeling has the following advantages: (1) It can quickly establish the mapping relationship between high, medium, and low fidelity data. (2) It can effectively solve the data imbalance problem in multi-fidelity modeling. (3) Compared with MFDNN, it has stronger noise resistance and higher prediction accuracy. Additionally, this paper discusses the scalability problem of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> method when n = 4 and n = 5, providing a reference for further research on the combined modeling method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad718f
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A combined modeling method for complex multi-fidelity data fusion

Wanqiu Jiang, Lei Tang, Anping Wu, Qingfeng Wang et al.
6 citations
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
2.17
article

A combined modeling method for complex multi-fidelity data fusion

Wanqiu Jiang, Lei Tang, Anping Wu, Qingfeng Wang, Feng Liu, Yubo Li, Jun Huang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Currently, mainstream methods for multi-fidelity data fusion have achieved great success in many fields, but they generally suffer from poor scalability. Therefore, this paper proposes a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> combination modeling method for complex multi-fidelity data fusion, devoted to solving the modeling problems with three types of multi-fidelity data fusion, and explores a general solution for any n types of multi-fidelity data fusion. Different from the traditional direct modeling method—Multi-Fidelity Deep Neural Network (MFDNN)—the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> method is an indirect modeling method. The experimental results on three representative benchmark functions and the prediction tasks of SG6043 airfoil aerodynamic performance show that <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> combination modeling has the following advantages: (1) It can quickly establish the mapping relationship between high, medium, and low fidelity data. (2) It can effectively solve the data imbalance problem in multi-fidelity modeling. (3) Compared with MFDNN, it has stronger noise resistance and higher prediction accuracy. Additionally, this paper discusses the scalability problem of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> method when n = 4 and n = 5, providing a reference for further research on the combined modeling method.

Machine Learning Science and TechnologyVol. 5(3)
Southwest University of Science and Technology (CN), China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center (CN), Chinese Academy of Engineering (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.