The Mis‐conceptualisation of Societal Impact: Why the Swiss Approach to Societal Impact is Productive and not Inexistent

Abstract Societal impact as a buzz word is high on the agenda of policy‐makers around the world. Often, the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) is cited as the initiator of making the societal impact of research relevant and visible. Equally often, it is said that in Switzerland societal impact is not yet considered in higher education policy. In this paper, I show that both claims are as wrong as they are common. I argue that the UK REF's “impact agenda” is strongly linked to a specific ideology and does not represent the only approach to valorizing and fostering the research‐society nexus. By pointing out some major issues in impact evaluation and presenting how the research‐society nexus is discussed in Swiss science policy as a contrasting case, I sketch an approach to impact evaluation based on the role of research in society that considers different forms of knowledge generation and dissemination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Swiss Political Science Review
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12618
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Mis‐conceptualisation of Societal Impact: Why the Swiss Approach to Societal Impact is Productive and not Inexistent

Michael Ochsner
1 citations
Swiss Political Science Review
Higher Education Governance and Development
2.23
article

The Mis‐conceptualisation of Societal Impact: Why the Swiss Approach to Societal Impact is Productive and not Inexistent

Michael Ochsner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Societal impact as a buzz word is high on the agenda of policy‐makers around the world. Often, the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) is cited as the initiator of making the societal impact of research relevant and visible. Equally often, it is said that in Switzerland societal impact is not yet considered in higher education policy. In this paper, I show that both claims are as wrong as they are common. I argue that the UK REF's “impact agenda” is strongly linked to a specific ideology and does not represent the only approach to valorizing and fostering the research‐society nexus. By pointing out some major issues in impact evaluation and presenting how the research‐society nexus is discussed in Swiss science policy as a contrasting case, I sketch an approach to impact evaluation based on the role of research in society that considers different forms of knowledge generation and dissemination.

Swiss Political Science ReviewVol. 30(3)
University of Lausanne (CH)
European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Higher Education Governance and Development
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.