The impact of electric field strength on the accuracy of boron dopant quantification in silicon using atom probe tomography

This study investigates the impact of the surface electric field on the quantification accuracy of boron (B) implanted silicon (Si) using atom probe tomography (APT). The Si Charge-State Ratio (CSR(Si) = Si<sup>2+</sup>/Si<sup>+</sup>) was used as an indirect measure of the average apex electric field during analysis. For a range of electric fields, the accuracy of the total implanted dose and the depth profile shape determined by APT was evaluated against the National Institute of Standards and Technology Standard Reference Material 2137. The radial (non-)uniformity of the detected B was also examined. At a higher surface electric field (i.e., a greater CSR(Si)), the determined B dose converges on the certified dose. Additionally, the depth profile shape tends towards that derived by secondary ion mass spectrometry. This improvement coincides with a more uniform radial B distribution, evidenced by desorption maps. In contrast, for lower surface electric fields (i.e., a lower CSR(Si)), the B dose is significantly underestimated, and the depth profile is artificially stretched. The desorption maps also indicate a highly inhomogeneous B emission localized around the center of the detector, which is believed to be an artifact of B surface migration on the tip of the sample. For the purposes of routine investigations of semiconductor devices using APT, these results illustrate the potential origin of quantification artifacts and their severity at different operating conditions, thus providing pathways towards best practices for accurate and repeatable measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultramicroscopy
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2024.114034
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of electric field strength on the accuracy of boron dopant quantification in silicon using atom probe tomography

Nabil D. Bassim, Brian Langelier, Ramya Cuduvally, Gabriel Arcuri et al.
6 citations
Ultramicroscopy
Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques
1.11
article

The impact of electric field strength on the accuracy of boron dopant quantification in silicon using atom probe tomography

Nabil D. Bassim, Brian Langelier, Ramya Cuduvally, Gabriel Arcuri, R. J. H. Morris, Bavley Guerguis
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of the surface electric field on the quantification accuracy of boron (B) implanted silicon (Si) using atom probe tomography (APT). The Si Charge-State Ratio (CSR(Si) = Si<sup>2+</sup>/Si<sup>+</sup>) was used as an indirect measure of the average apex electric field during analysis. For a range of electric fields, the accuracy of the total implanted dose and the depth profile shape determined by APT was evaluated against the National Institute of Standards and Technology Standard Reference Material 2137. The radial (non-)uniformity of the detected B was also examined. At a higher surface electric field (i.e., a greater CSR(Si)), the determined B dose converges on the certified dose. Additionally, the depth profile shape tends towards that derived by secondary ion mass spectrometry. This improvement coincides with a more uniform radial B distribution, evidenced by desorption maps. In contrast, for lower surface electric fields (i.e., a lower CSR(Si)), the B dose is significantly underestimated, and the depth profile is artificially stretched. The desorption maps also indicate a highly inhomogeneous B emission localized around the center of the detector, which is believed to be an artifact of B surface migration on the tip of the sample. For the purposes of routine investigations of semiconductor devices using APT, these results illustrate the potential origin of quantification artifacts and their severity at different operating conditions, thus providing pathways towards best practices for accurate and repeatable measurements.

UltramicroscopyVol. 266
IMEC (BE), McMaster University (CA)
McMaster University, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.