Duration, not timing during the photoperiod, of far-red application determines the yield increase in tomato

• Fruit yield increased linearly with the duration of far-red application. • Timing of far-red application during the photoperiod did not affect fruit yield. • Despite fruit yield increase, fruit quality was not reduced by far-red application. • Far-red increased fruit yield as efficiently as photosynthetic active radiation. Supplementary far-red light may increase fruit yield in greenhouse tomato cultivation. Apart from end-of-day applications, research has focussed on the effects of far-red light during the entire photoperiod, while few studies focused on the timing of far-red application. In this study, we assessed the impact of timing and duration of far-red application on fruit yield and quality in a high-wire tomato crop. Two commercial tomato cultivars were grown under 226 μmol m −2 s −1 of red and white supplementary LED lighting. Far-red light (63 μmol m −2 s −1 ) was additionally supplied during either the first or the second half of the photoperiod. These treatments were compared to a negative control, where no far-red light was supplied, and a positive control, where far-red light was supplied during the whole photoperiod. A yield component analysis was conducted to identify the parameters responsible for changes in fruit yield. We determined that fruit yield, total fruit dry weight and fruit production per unit of supplementary PAR light (400–700 nm) increased linearly with the duration of far-red application. Fruit yield was increased to a similar extent whether far-red was supplemented in the first or in the second half of the photoperiod. While different light treatments included 0, 14, or 28 % far-red in their cumulative supplementary photon flux density, there were no significant differences in their fruit production per unit of supplementary radiation (400–800 nm). Supplementary far-red increased fruit dry weight per unit of cultivation area by 23 % to 25 % as a result of increasing both plant dry weight (10 % to 12 %) and dry weight partitioning to the fruits (10 % to 14 %). The increase in fruit yield was less than the corresponding increase in total fruit dry weight due to a simultaneous increase in fruit dry matter content. Total soluble solids and pH of the fruits were hardly affected by far-red application. We concluded that supplementary far-red increased tomato fruit yield without compromising fruit quality, with this increase being determined by the duration of far-red application, not by its timing during the photoperiod.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientia Horticulturae
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113553
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Duration, not timing during the photoperiod, of far-red application determines the yield increase in tomato

Frank F. Millenaar, Yongran Ji, E. Heuvelink, L.F.M. Marcelis et al.
11 citations
Scientia Horticulturae
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
6.60
article

Duration, not timing during the photoperiod, of far-red application determines the yield increase in tomato

Frank F. Millenaar, Yongran Ji, E. Heuvelink, L.F.M. Marcelis, Tijmen Kerstens, Elena Vincenzi, Sophie Deelen, Xuemeng Lai, Esther de Beer
article en
11 citations

Abstract

• Fruit yield increased linearly with the duration of far-red application. • Timing of far-red application during the photoperiod did not affect fruit yield. • Despite fruit yield increase, fruit quality was not reduced by far-red application. • Far-red increased fruit yield as efficiently as photosynthetic active radiation. Supplementary far-red light may increase fruit yield in greenhouse tomato cultivation. Apart from end-of-day applications, research has focussed on the effects of far-red light during the entire photoperiod, while few studies focused on the timing of far-red application. In this study, we assessed the impact of timing and duration of far-red application on fruit yield and quality in a high-wire tomato crop. Two commercial tomato cultivars were grown under 226 μmol m −2 s −1 of red and white supplementary LED lighting. Far-red light (63 μmol m −2 s −1 ) was additionally supplied during either the first or the second half of the photoperiod. These treatments were compared to a negative control, where no far-red light was supplied, and a positive control, where far-red light was supplied during the whole photoperiod. A yield component analysis was conducted to identify the parameters responsible for changes in fruit yield. We determined that fruit yield, total fruit dry weight and fruit production per unit of supplementary PAR light (400–700 nm) increased linearly with the duration of far-red application. Fruit yield was increased to a similar extent whether far-red was supplemented in the first or in the second half of the photoperiod. While different light treatments included 0, 14, or 28 % far-red in their cumulative supplementary photon flux density, there were no significant differences in their fruit production per unit of supplementary radiation (400–800 nm). Supplementary far-red increased fruit dry weight per unit of cultivation area by 23 % to 25 % as a result of increasing both plant dry weight (10 % to 12 %) and dry weight partitioning to the fruits (10 % to 14 %). The increase in fruit yield was less than the corresponding increase in total fruit dry weight due to a simultaneous increase in fruit dry matter content. Total soluble solids and pH of the fruits were hardly affected by far-red application. We concluded that supplementary far-red increased tomato fruit yield without compromising fruit quality, with this increase being determined by the duration of far-red application, not by its timing during the photoperiod.

Scientia HorticulturaeVol. 338
Graduate School Experimental Plant Sciences (NL), Research International (United States) (US), Signify (Netherlands) (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Topconsortium voor Kennis en Innovatie
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
6.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.