Experimental Measurements for Equilibrium Conditions of Carbon Dioxide Hydrate Mixtures with Each Additive of 2-Methoxyethyl Ether, 1,1,3,3-Tetramethylguanidine, 4-Methylmorpholine, 1-Ethyl-3-Methylimidazolium Chloride, Urea, and 1,3-Cyclohexanebis(m

Due to decarbonization issues, there is growing concern about greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide (CO2). Gas hydrate research is a potential solution to energy needs and CO2 storage tasks. Naturally occurring methane hydrates provide natural gas availability, while CO2 hydrates are also receiving widespread attention for carbon capture, storage, and pipeline flow assurance. This study measured the thermodynamic equilibrium temperatures and pressures at the dissociation points for CO2 hydrate mixtures containing various additives. These results provide fundamental data on the thermodynamic phase boundaries of CO2 hydrate mixtures where three phases of hydrate (H), liquid water (Lw), and vapor (V) coexisted. The equilibrium conditions for CO2 with pure water and various additives including 2-methoxyethyl ether (0.20 and 0.30 mass fractions), 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine (0.20 and 0.30 mass fractions), 4-methylmorpholine (0.10 and 0.20 mass fractions), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (0.10, 0.20, and 0.30 mass fractions), urea (0.10, 0.20, and 0.30 mass fractions), and 1,3-cyclohexanebis(methylamine) (0.10 and 0.20 mass fractions) were experimentally measured in the pressure range of 1.54–3.58 MPa using the isochoric and temperature cycling method. These additives all had an inhibition effect on the formation of CO2 hydrates, and the maximum average inhibition effect of each additive on the equilibrium temperature ranged from 5 to 11 K. To simulate seawater conditions, equilibrium conditions for CO2 hydrate mixtures with three of these additives are also reported. The Clausius–Clapeyron equation was used to estimate possible hydrate structures. The results show that the CO2 hydrate mixtures exhibited possible sI structures after adding each additive in this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.4c00280
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Measurements for Equilibrium Conditions of Carbon Dioxide Hydrate Mixtures with Each Additive of 2-Methoxyethyl Ether, 1,1,3,3-Tetramethylguanidine, 4-Methylmorpholine, 1-Ethyl-3-Methylimidazolium Chloride, Urea, and 1,3-Cyclohexanebis(m

Yan-Ping Chen, Jung-Chin Tsai, Yueh-Yun Lin, Muoi Tang et al.
1 citations
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
0.25
article

Experimental Measurements for Equilibrium Conditions of Carbon Dioxide Hydrate Mixtures with Each Additive of 2-Methoxyethyl Ether, 1,1,3,3-Tetramethylguanidine, 4-Methylmorpholine, 1-Ethyl-3-Methylimidazolium Chloride, Urea, and 1,3-Cyclohexanebis(m

Yan-Ping Chen, Jung-Chin Tsai, Yueh-Yun Lin, Muoi Tang, Chie‐Shaan Su, Chi-Hsiang Ho, Yang-Jung Lai, Cheng‐Che Wu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Due to decarbonization issues, there is growing concern about greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide (CO2). Gas hydrate research is a potential solution to energy needs and CO2 storage tasks. Naturally occurring methane hydrates provide natural gas availability, while CO2 hydrates are also receiving widespread attention for carbon capture, storage, and pipeline flow assurance. This study measured the thermodynamic equilibrium temperatures and pressures at the dissociation points for CO2 hydrate mixtures containing various additives. These results provide fundamental data on the thermodynamic phase boundaries of CO2 hydrate mixtures where three phases of hydrate (H), liquid water (Lw), and vapor (V) coexisted. The equilibrium conditions for CO2 with pure water and various additives including 2-methoxyethyl ether (0.20 and 0.30 mass fractions), 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine (0.20 and 0.30 mass fractions), 4-methylmorpholine (0.10 and 0.20 mass fractions), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (0.10, 0.20, and 0.30 mass fractions), urea (0.10, 0.20, and 0.30 mass fractions), and 1,3-cyclohexanebis(methylamine) (0.10 and 0.20 mass fractions) were experimentally measured in the pressure range of 1.54–3.58 MPa using the isochoric and temperature cycling method. These additives all had an inhibition effect on the formation of CO2 hydrates, and the maximum average inhibition effect of each additive on the equilibrium temperature ranged from 5 to 11 K. To simulate seawater conditions, equilibrium conditions for CO2 hydrate mixtures with three of these additives are also reported. The Clausius–Clapeyron equation was used to estimate possible hydrate structures. The results show that the CO2 hydrate mixtures exhibited possible sI structures after adding each additive in this study.

Journal of Chemical & Engineering DataVol. 69(9)
National Taipei University of Technology (TW), Ming Chi University of Technology (TW), National Taiwan University (TW), Chinese Culture University (TW)
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
0.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.