Can compulsory voting reduce information acquisition?

An election with full turnout is supposed to achieve an outcome that perfectly reflects the majority's preference.This result requires voters to be perfectly informed about their preferences and to vote accordingly.I show that incentivizing participation with an abstention fine does not necessarily incentivize information acquisition.While a small abstention fine always increases information acquisition compared to Voluntary Voting, a high abstention fine that achieves full turnout increases information acquisition only if voting costs are high.If voting costs are low, the opposite is true: Less individuals acquire information under Compulsory Voting with full turnout than under Voluntary Voting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Games and Economic Behavior
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2024.08.005
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can compulsory voting reduce information acquisition?

Linnéa Marie Rohde
Games and Economic Behavior
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Can compulsory voting reduce information acquisition?

Linnéa Marie Rohde
article en

Abstract

An election with full turnout is supposed to achieve an outcome that perfectly reflects the majority's preference.This result requires voters to be perfectly informed about their preferences and to vote accordingly.I show that incentivizing participation with an abstention fine does not necessarily incentivize information acquisition.While a small abstention fine always increases information acquisition compared to Voluntary Voting, a high abstention fine that achieves full turnout increases information acquisition only if voting costs are high.If voting costs are low, the opposite is true: Less individuals acquire information under Compulsory Voting with full turnout than under Voluntary Voting.

Games and Economic BehaviorVol. 147
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Universität Mannheim
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.