Social work with unaccompanied asylum-seeking children and young people: resisting the rhetoric

This article addresses the complex dynamics surrounding unaccompanied asylum-seeking children in the UK. While states are legally bound to provide refuge under such treaties as the 1951 Refugee Convention, political considerations often lead to the implementation of social control mechanisms that may compromise the rights and dignity of displaced individuals. The most recent restrictive immigration legislation, which raises concerns about potential violations of the Refugee Convention, represents the latest in a long line from successive governments to reduce the number of people seeking asylum in the UK. Against this backdrop, drawing on original empirical research, this article offers insights into the unique challenges faced by social workers operating at the immigration–welfare nexus. Focusing on conflicts between control-orientated and welfare-driven practices, the article uncovers how social work is practised within this context. The binary distinctions between control-orientated or welfare-driven practitioners are unhelpful and unrealistic, with the reality much more complex.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical and Radical Social Work
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/20498608y2024d000000041
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social work with unaccompanied asylum-seeking children and young people: resisting the rhetoric

Deborah Hadwin, Gurnam Singh
5 citations
Critical and Radical Social Work
Social Work Education and Practice
4.28
article

Social work with unaccompanied asylum-seeking children and young people: resisting the rhetoric

Deborah Hadwin, Gurnam Singh
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This article addresses the complex dynamics surrounding unaccompanied asylum-seeking children in the UK. While states are legally bound to provide refuge under such treaties as the 1951 Refugee Convention, political considerations often lead to the implementation of social control mechanisms that may compromise the rights and dignity of displaced individuals. The most recent restrictive immigration legislation, which raises concerns about potential violations of the Refugee Convention, represents the latest in a long line from successive governments to reduce the number of people seeking asylum in the UK. Against this backdrop, drawing on original empirical research, this article offers insights into the unique challenges faced by social workers operating at the immigration–welfare nexus. Focusing on conflicts between control-orientated and welfare-driven practices, the article uncovers how social work is practised within this context. The binary distinctions between control-orientated or welfare-driven practitioners are unhelpful and unrealistic, with the reality much more complex.

Critical and Radical Social WorkVol. 13(1)
University of Warwick (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Social Work Education and Practice
4.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.