Laboratory and Numerical Modeling of a Lava Flow Analogue: A Comparative Analysis

Volcanic eruptions can bring about lava flows, posing significant hazards and rare direct threats to human life, but they can also cause extensive damage to property and economic activities. Managing volcanic disasters demands swift and accurate information on the behaviour and evolution of lava flows, particularly regarding their extension, displacement, and trajectory. This study addresses numerical and laboratory modelling to understand the dynamics of a lava flow and its frontal advancement. Laboratory experiments of a lava flow analogue, exhibiting a non-Newtonian Herschel–Bulkley fluid behaviour, have been conducted. The fluid parameters at varying temperatures have been determined on the basis of the rheometer and thermal camera measurements. A flow of the Herschel–Bulkley fluid (the lava flow analogue with the fluid parameters determined from the laboratory experiments) is then simulated numerically using the Abaqus software, where a smoothed particle hydrodynamics method has been implemented. A run-out distance, frontal flow displacement, and flow velocity have been determined during laboratory and numerical modelling. When the fluid parameters measured at a constant temperature of 80°C are used, the numerical results diverge from the experimental results over time. To mimic closely the dynamics of the lava flow analogue inferred from the laboratory experiment with its dynamics in the numerical modelling, time-dependent adjustments to the Herschel–Bulkley fluid parameters determined at lower temperatures have been introduced by changing their values during a numerical simulation. This study underscores the importance of constraining parameters of numerical models by the values obtained from laboratory measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Volcanology and Seismology
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s0742046324700623
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laboratory and Numerical Modeling of a Lava Flow Analogue: A Comparative Analysis

Mahsa Bokharaeian, Árpád Csámer
Journal of Volcanology and Seismology
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
article

Laboratory and Numerical Modeling of a Lava Flow Analogue: A Comparative Analysis

Mahsa Bokharaeian, Árpád Csámer
article en

Abstract

Volcanic eruptions can bring about lava flows, posing significant hazards and rare direct threats to human life, but they can also cause extensive damage to property and economic activities. Managing volcanic disasters demands swift and accurate information on the behaviour and evolution of lava flows, particularly regarding their extension, displacement, and trajectory. This study addresses numerical and laboratory modelling to understand the dynamics of a lava flow and its frontal advancement. Laboratory experiments of a lava flow analogue, exhibiting a non-Newtonian Herschel–Bulkley fluid behaviour, have been conducted. The fluid parameters at varying temperatures have been determined on the basis of the rheometer and thermal camera measurements. A flow of the Herschel–Bulkley fluid (the lava flow analogue with the fluid parameters determined from the laboratory experiments) is then simulated numerically using the Abaqus software, where a smoothed particle hydrodynamics method has been implemented. A run-out distance, frontal flow displacement, and flow velocity have been determined during laboratory and numerical modelling. When the fluid parameters measured at a constant temperature of 80°C are used, the numerical results diverge from the experimental results over time. To mimic closely the dynamics of the lava flow analogue inferred from the laboratory experiment with its dynamics in the numerical modelling, time-dependent adjustments to the Herschel–Bulkley fluid parameters determined at lower temperatures have been introduced by changing their values during a numerical simulation. This study underscores the importance of constraining parameters of numerical models by the values obtained from laboratory measurements.

Journal of Volcanology and SeismologyVol. 18(4)
University of Debrecen (HU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.